Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shanks, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shanks, A. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Algae
Right arrow Echinoderms
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Fish
Right arrow Hemichordata
Right arrow Annelids
Right arrow Larval Biology
Right arrow Miscellaneous Invertebrates
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Reproduction
Right arrow Sponges
Right arrow Urochordates
Right arrow Cnidarians
Right arrow Crustaceans
Biol. Bull. 216: 373-385. (June 2009)
© 2009 Marine Biological Laboratory

Pelagic Larval Duration and Dispersal Distance Revisited

Alan L. Shanks

University of Oregon, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 5389, Charleston, Oregon 97420

E-mail: ashanks{at}uoregon.edu

I present dispersal distances for 44 species with data on propagule duration (PD) for 40 of these. Data were combined with those in Shanks et al. (2003; Ecol. Appl. 13: S159–S169), providing information on 67 species. PD and dispersal distance are correlated, but with many exceptions. The distribution of dispersal distances was bimodal. Many species with PDs longer than 1 day dispersed less than 1 km, while others dispersed tens to hundreds of kilometers. Organisms with short dispersal distances were pelagic briefly or remained close to the bottom while pelagic. Null models of passively dispersing propagules adequately predict dispersal distance for organisms with short PDs (<1 day), but overestimate dispersal distances for those with longer PDs. These models predict that propagules are transported tens of kilometers offshore; however, many types remain within the coastal boundary layer where currents are slower and more variable, leading to lower than predicted dispersal. At short PDs, dispersal distances estimated from genetic data are similar to observed. At long PDs, genetic data generally overestimate dispersal distance. This discrepancy is probably due to the effect of rare individuals that disperse long distances, thus smoothing genetic differences between populations. Larval behavior and species’ life-history traits can play a critical role in determining dispersal distance.

Abbreviations: LDD, long-distance dispersal • PD, propagule duration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. B. Emlet, S. A. Maslakova, A. L. Shanks, and C. M. Young
Biological Bulletin Virtual Symposium: Biology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 201 - 202.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
A. Metaxas and M. Saunders
Quantifying the "Bio-" Components in Biophysical Models of Larval Transport in Marine Benthic Invertebrates: Advances and Pitfalls
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 257 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.