Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 78: 68-79. (February 1940)
© 1940 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, F.

STUDIES ON A CORTICAL LAYER RESPONSE TO STIMULATING AGENTS IN THE ARBACIA EGG

III. RESPONSE TO NON-ELECTROLYTES

FLOYD MOSER 1

1 From the Zoölogical Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania; and the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass.

1. Arbacia punctulata eggs treated with molar concentrations of non-electrolyte solutions (urea, thiourea, glycerine or sucrose) exhibit essentially the same kind of visible cortical response as that obtained with sperm cells and other stimulating agents.

2. Typically the cortical response to non-electrolyte solutions results in the formation of a perivitelline space which is from two to three times as wide as that obtained upon insemination.

3. Continued exposure to non-electrolyte solution following the visible cortical response results in the dissolution of the fertilization membrane.

4. Since activation, however incomplete, is obtained upon treatment with non-electrolyte solutions, these solutions may be regarded as being artificial parthenogenetic agents.

5. Fertilization has been superposed upon the incomplete activation obtained in the presence of non-electrolyte solutions.

6. Within certain limits, as the length of exposure to the non-electrolyte solution increases, an increase in the percentage of blastulae among the inseminated treated eggs occurs; this fact may be correlated with (3) above.

7. It has been suggested that results reported by Moore (1930a, 1930b), Moore and Moore (1931), Motomura (1934, 1938), and Chase (1935) may be explained on the basis of the observations and results presented in this paper.

8. The amoeboid activity of Arbacia eggs treated with urea has been briefly described.

9. The observations and results presented in this paper are essentially in agreement with the views considered in the earlier papers of the present series (Moser, 1939a, 1939b).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Epel, A. M. Weaver, A. V. Muchmore, and R. T. Schimke
beta-1,3-Glucanase of Sea Urchin Eggs: Release from Particles at Fertilization
Science, January 17, 1969; 163(3864): 294 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1940 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.