Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 83: 334-352. (December 1942)
© 1942 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by WIERSMA, C. A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by WIERSMA, C. A. G.

THE INFLUENCE OF CERTAIN DRUGS ON THE CRUSTACEAN NERVE-MUSCLE SYSTEM

C. H. ELLIS 1, C. H. THIENES 1, and C. A. G. WIERSMA 1

1 From the William G. Kerckhoff Laboratories of the Biological Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

The effects of a wide selection of drugs on the peripheral nerve-muscle preparations of the cheliped of the crayfish, Cambarus clarkii, were studied.

Of all drugs used, the local anaesthetics were the only ones which, as a group, showed the customary vertebrate effects on crustacean preparations.

In general, the effects of the drugs used in the investigation were limited to changes in the excitability of the nerve fiber. These effects were of two types; either the refractory period of the nerve was markedly lengthened, or the nerve fiber became so hypersensitive that excitatory stimuli set up multiple discharges in the nerve.

The effects of the drugs on peripheral inhibition were studied, with the conclusion that the substances exert little effect on the mechanisms involved in these phenomena, especially on those responsible for supplementary inhibition.

An investigation was made into certain "reversal" effects in which stimulation of the inhibitory axon showed an excitation, and in which stimulation of the excitatory axon showed an inhibitory effect. Of these, the former is ascribed to stimulation of the adjacent hypersensitive motor fiber upon stimulation of the inhibitor; the latter, to a Wedensky-block.

The central effects appear to be quite different from the effects on the peripheral systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. J. Futamachi
Acetylcholine:Possible Neuromuscular Transmitter in Crustacea
Science, March 24, 1972; 175(4028): 1373 - 1375.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1942 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.