Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Biol Bull 87: 59-72. (August 1944)
© 1944 Marine Biological Laboratory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COE, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by FOX, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by COE, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by FOX, D. L.

BIOLOGY OF THE CALIFORNIA SEA-MUSSEL (MYTILUS CALIFORNIANUS). III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND RATE OF GROWTH

WESLEY R. COE 1 and DENIS L. FOX 1

1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla

This study offers additional evidence as to the complexity of the environmental conditions found along the shores of the ocean and which affect so profoundly the lives of the organisms residing there. Variations in the growth rates will obviously depend upon the interaction of several of these conditions, not the least important of which are the temperature and the character and abundance of the food supply.

Furthermore these environmental conditions are constantly changing, due in part to the continual motion of the water. At the locality where the foregoing observations were made, there are not only the variable currents caused by wind and tidal changes, but there is also a drift along the coast at a rate averaging four to five miles per day. Consequently the water in which the mussels are living and the conditions associated therewith may differ not only from month to month but also from day to day and even from hour to hour. In one week there may be ten to fifty times as much phytoplankton in the water as in the following week. The yearly averages are more stable but these may vary by more than five fold.

Monthly correlations, extending over four years, between the growth rates of the mussels and the prevalent environmental conditions offer conclusive evidence that the most rapid increase in size takes place at temperatures from 17 to 20° C., although growth continues less rapidly at 14° or lower. Feeding continues at a temperature as low as 7 to 8° and as high as 27 to 28°.

The average number of diatoms per liter was 38,700 in 1940, 16,600 in 1941, 12,600 in 1942 and 54,300 in 1943. The average number of dinoflagellates for the same years was 12,100, 9880, 54,750 and 49,500, respectively. The average monthly increment in the lengths of the mussels was 3.43 mm. in 1940, 3.96 in 1941, 5.43 mm. in 1942 and 5.11 mm. in 1943, indicating a yearly variation of more than 50 per cent.

It is obvious that the two years with the largest dinoflagellate populations have been conducive to the most rapid growth of the mussels, but an increase of four fold in abundance has been associated with an increased growth rate of only 42 per cent. The correlation noted is evidently not direct, since the living dinoflagellates can supply only a small fraction of the mussels' nutritive requirements. Both mussels and dinoflagellates appear to thrive under the same environmental conditions. That the living diatoms and bacteria are of even less importance in the life of the mussel is indicated not only by the small amount of organic matter that they contain but also by the fact that the mussels grew most rapidly in the year with the smallest number of diatoms and least rapidly in the year when the number was three times as great.

More direct correlations with the growth rates of the mussels are found in the reproductive periodicities of various invertebrate populations which contribute so largely to the available organic detritus and thereby to the mussels' nutrition.

The principal food supply of this species of mussel consists of minute particles of organic detritus derived from the disintegration of the cells of all kinds of marine organisms, both animals and plants, supplemented by living and dead unicellular organisms of minute size as well as living and dead gametes. There is no evidence that organic matter in true solution can be utilized until after it has been changed into particulate form by the action of unicellular organisms.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1944 by the Marine Biological Laboratory.