Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breithaupt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breithaupt, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Crustaceans
Right arrow Ecology
Biol. Bull. 200: 150-154. (April 2001)
© 2001 Marine Biological Laboratory

Fan Organs of Crayfish Enhance Chemical Information Flow

Thomas Breithaupt

Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Postfach 5560, 78457 Konstanz, Germany

E-mail: Thomas.Breithaupt{at}uni-konstanz.de


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
Animals as well as autonomous robots need to acquire environmental signals in order to adjust their activity in time and space. Some information is accessible to the sensors only as a result of specific behaviors for stimulus acquisition. Due to the slow rate of molecular diffusion, dispersal of chemical stimuli depends on fluid flow. Aquatic crustaceans can generate directed water currents by specialized appendages. Here I describe the crayfish fan organs, which are feathered flagella of the mouthparts, and their activity in sending and receiving chemical signals in environments with stagnant flow conditions. During the powerstroke, the fan opens and displaces water; during the return stroke, it collapses and thereby minimizes drag. These organs can create a variety of flow fields including water jets, and in many different directions. Bilateral upward fanning draws water horizontally from all directions toward the anterior chemoreceptors. Unilateral upward fanning draws water from only one side towards the body. The versatility of the crayfish fan organ makes it a candidate for biomimetic reconstruction and use in autonomous robots that can search chemical sources.


    Exchange of Chemical Information at Different Size Scales
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
A prerequisite of life is the exchange of matter and information between an organism and its environment. Whereas the exchange of (organic) matter is necessary for nutrient uptake by and waste removal from living organisms, the acquisition of information that serves to modify the behavior of organisms with respect to environmental resources (e.g., water, food, mates) and threats (e.g., predators, obstacles) is important for any living organism as well as for autonomous robots.

The oldest method of information exchange is by means of chemical stimuli. Microorganisms (e.g., motile bacteria) need to search for micropatches of higher nutrient concentration and adjust their motility with respect to chemical stimuli (Blackburn et al., 1998). Microorganisms also exchange chemical signals ("pheromones") with conspecifics to synchronize their mating activity (Agosta, 1992). The movement of chemicals from a source to a receiver at such small size scales (below 0.1 mm, Reynolds number below 10-2) is driven by molecular diffusion, or random molecular motion. Cohesion among water molecules at that scale makes it almost impossible to influence the direction of chemical information flow except by locomotion of the whole organism.

With increasing size and velocity of organisms (increasing Reynolds number) molecular diffusion loses in importance for the dispersal of chemicals (Weissburg, 2000). In water, molecular diffusion is a very slow process that on average would displace a molecule by no more than 0.7 mm (70 mm in air) in 1 min and by only 5 mm (500 mm in air) in 1 h (Dusenbery, 1992). Water flow is much more effective in dispersing odor molecules, and animals can influence the flow in their immediate neighborhood by using undulating, beating, or fanning appendages. By modulating the nearby flow pattern, they can facilitate the exchange of chemical information with their environment. Insects as well as some vertebrates use wing-fanning for delivering pheromones to their mates (bees: Free, 1987; butterflies: Boppré, 1984; bats: Voigt and von Helversen, 1999). Wing-fanning may facilitate odor perception by drawing nearby molecules towards the receptors. Wing-fanning of silkworm moths in response to pheromone (Agosta, 1992) may aid in stimulus acquisition (Ishida et al., 1996). Crustaceans are well known for their ability to create directed water currents by pumping or fanning appendages (Brock, 1926; Burrows and Willows, 1969; Budd et al., 1979; Koehl and Strickler, 1981; Atema, 1985; Lavalli and Factor, 1995). This behavior can be used for gill ventilation, locomotion, suspension feeding, and chemoreception or chemical signaling. Planktonic copepods, small crustaceans of 1 to 10 mm, generate water currents that are used for capturing food particles and that carry odor information from the food particles to the chemoreceptors (Yen, 2000). Here I describe the fanning behavior of crayfish, typical of larger crustaceans, that is used for both sending and receiving chemical signals in aquatic environments with stagnant flow conditions.


    Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan Organs of Crayfish
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
One of the first reactions of many crustaceans to chemical stimulation is the onset of the rhythmic beating of three pairs of flagella of the maxillipeds (mouthparts). These so-called fan organs (Atema, 1985) in crayfish are distributed around the mouth opening below the major chemoreceptor organs ("antennules") and the urinary pore ("nephropore") (Fig. 1A). Each fan organ consists of a multi-segmental, flattened stem. It is feathered in one plane, with setae emerging laterally on both sides of the flattened stem (Fig. 1B). The setae are feathered themselves, and their rami overlap with those of adjacent setae to form a dense layer (Fig. 1B). During the power stroke, the fan—with stem erect and setae extended—acts like a paddle propelling fluid past the organism (Fig. 1B; Cheer and Koehl, 1987). During the recovery stroke, the setae are tilted downstream and the stem is flexed (Fig. 1C). This behavior reduces the area of the leading, water-displacing surface and therefore effectively reduces the drag during the return stroke. This fanning activity is similar to that of a rowing paddle and can generate unidirectional flow. All three flagella on one side usually beat simultaneously and with the same frequency (between 5 and 8 Hz in Procambarus clarkii). The rhythmic movements of the three flagella are metachronally phase-shifted by about 0.2 to 0.5 wavelengths (data from high-speed video-recordings; Breithaupt, unpubl. data). By changing the angle of the mouthparts, the flagella can modify the axis of fanning activity. By fanning only one side or both sides and by changing the direction of fanning activity, crayfish can generate a variety of flow fields.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Location of fan organs, urinary pores (nephropores), and major chemoreceptor organs (antennules) of crayfish. (B) The fan organs are multi-segmental flagella of the mouthparts (maxillipeds) with feathered setae on the distal part. During the power stroke (scanning electron microscopy "SEM" picture of Procambarus clarkii) the feathered hairs are extended. (C) During the recovery stroke (SEM picture of Procambarus clarkii) the feathered hairs are tilted downstream. White scale bars in SEM pictures represent 1 mm.

 

    Flow Fields Generated by the Fan Organs
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
Visualization of the flow fields using small (50 µm), neutrally buoyant particles illuminated within a horizontal and a vertical light sheet (Breithaupt and Ayers, 1998) revealed that crayfish can modulate the flow environment in their immediate vicinity in a variety of ways (Fig. 2). In the horizontal plane that is probably most significant for most of the crayfish’s activities, the flow can be directed either away from (Fig. 2A, B) or toward (Fig. 2C, D) the head region. Flow velocity of the outgoing water jets can be up to 4 cm/s. Incoming water in the horizontal plane is usually much slower, with velocities between 0.1 and 0.5 cm/s depending on the distance to the fan organs. By beating the flagella on only one side, crayfish can draw in water exclusively from this side (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Examples of horizontal flow fields generated by the fan organs of an adult male crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) without claws. Flow pictures were generated by superimposing 25 video-frames (Breithaupt and Ayers, 1998) of neutrally buoyant particles moving in a 5-mm-thick horizontal light sheet, and tracing the flow lines. (A) Fans of both sides beat backward and generate bilateral backward-directed water jets (light sheet at 1 cm above ground lasting for 2 s). Large arrows indicate fluid velocities of 1 cm/s; small arrows represent velocities of 0.5 cm/s. (B) Fans of left side only are beating forward and produce a forward-directed jet (at 3.5 cm for 2 s; arrows as in A). (C) Fans of both sides beat upward and in the horizontal plane draw water from all directions towards the frontal mouthparts (at 1 cm for 10 s). Arrows denote fluid velocities of 0.1 cm/s. (D) Fans of right side only beat upward and draw water from right to left (at 2.5 cm for 12 s; arrows as in C).

 

    Biological Significance of Fanning Behavior
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
Many crayfish species live in environments with stagnant flow conditions. The flow velocity in a lake inhabited by the European narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) rarely exceeds 1 cm/s even on stormy days (T. Breithaupt and E. Ebert, unpubl. data). In such environments, flow fields created by the animals themselves help in getting access to distant odor stimuli and provide directional information. Fanning is a major activity of crayfish during food search in stagnant water. Blindfolded crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) with restrained fan organs that could not generate water currents were not able to find the odor source (T. Breithaupt and E. Ebert, unpubl. data). This demonstrates the importance of the fan organs in actively scanning the environment and transporting the odor molecules towards the chemoreceptors on the antennules (Fig. 1). The crayfish may identify the direction of the odor source by comparing the arrival time of the moving odor patches at different receptor locations on the bilateral antennules. Recent studies suggested bilateral directional information as a critical element in chemical orientation of decapod crustaceans at turbulent flow conditions (Atema, 1996; Grasso et al., 1998).

A second important function of the fan organs is to carry urine-borne pheromone from the nephropores to the chemoreceptors of nearby conspecifics. Visualization of urine release during fights of American lobsters and crayfish revealed that signaling with urine is an integral component of aggressive communication in these animals (Breithaupt and Atema, 2000; T. Breithaupt and P. Rohleder, unpubl. data). The crayfish Procambarus clarkii uses frontally projecting fan organ currents to carry urine signals toward the opponent (T. Breithaupt and P. Rohleder, unpubl. data). The currents are also used to direct urine signals in directions other than forward.


    Lessons to Learn From the Fan Organs of Crayfish
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 
Only by using such elaborate appendages can crustaceans acquire and send chemical information in environments with stagnant flow conditions. Fan organs are widely used in the animal kingdom to propel and direct chemical stimuli away from and toward organisms. Flow-generating devices can also greatly enhance the search success of autonomous robots orienting to chemical sources. The use of a rotating propeller fan has been shown to help terrestrial autonomous robots to locate chemical sources by actively drawing air to their chemical sensor and scanning different directions for the presence of chemicals (Nakamoto et al., 1999; Ishida et al., 2001). Recent progress in the development of aquatic robots has been inspired by research on crustaceans (Grasso, 2001). The versatility of the paddlelike fan design of the crayfish appendage goes beyond that of propeller fans by enabling the exchange of chemical information in three dimensions. A thorough analysis of the behavior and the mechanics of flow production as well as the underlying muscular and neural activity should further illuminate the functional organization of this beautiful system and may trigger biomimetic designs for artificial fans.


    Acknowledgments
 
Thanks to Frank Grasso for organizing the inter-disciplinary symposium. I would also like to thank Myriam Schmid and Dr. Joachim Hentschel for assistance in the SEM study of fan organs, the graphics workshop of the University of Konstanz for the crayfish drawing in Fig. 1, Kirsten Pohlmann and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Prof. Dr. Axel Meyer for supporting the study. The research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Br 1321/3-1).


    Footnotes
 
This paper was originally presented at a workshop titled Invertebrate Sensory Information Processing: Implications for Biologically Inspired Autonomous Systems. The workshop, which was held at the J. Erik Jonsson Center for the National Academy of Sciences, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, from 15–17 April 2000, was sponsored by the Center for Advanced Studies in the Space Life Sciences at the Marine Biological Laboratory, and funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Cooperative Agreement NCC 2-896.


    Literature Cited
 TOP
 Abstract
 Exchange of Chemical Information...
 Maxilliped Flagella, the Fan...
 Flow Fields Generated by...
 Biological Significance of...
 Lessons to Learn From...
 Literature Cited
 

    Agosta, W. C. 1992. Chemical Communication: the Language of Pheromones., Scientific American Library, New York.
    Atema, J. 1985. Chemoreception in the sea: adaptations of chemoreceptors and behaviour to aquatic stimulus conditions. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symp.39:386–423.
    Atema, J. 1996. Eddy chemotaxis and odor landscapes: exploration of nature with animal sensors. Biol. Bull.191:129–138.[ISI]
    Blackburn, N., T. Fenchel, and J. Mitchell. 1998. Microscale nutrient patches in planktonic habitats shown by chemotactic bacteria. Science282:2254–2256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Boppré, M. 1984. Chemically mediated interactions between butterflies. Pp. 259–275 in The Biology of Butterflies, R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery, eds. Academic Press, London.
    Breithaupt, T., and J. Atema. 2000. The timing of chemical signaling with urine in dominance fights of male lobsters (Homarus americanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.49:67–78.
    Breithaupt, T., and J. Ayers. 1998. Visualization and quantification of biological flow fields through video-based digital motion-analysis techniques. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol.31:55–61.
    Brock, F. 1926. Das Verhalten des Einsiedlerkrebses Pagurus arrosor Herbst während der Suche und Aufnahme der Nahrung. Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere6:415–552.
    Budd, T. W., J. C. Lewis, and M. L. Tracey. 1979. Filtration feeding in Orconectes propinquus and Cambarus robustus (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana Suppl.5:131–134.
    Burrows, M., and A. O. D. Willows. 1969. Neuronal co-ordination of rhythmic maxilliped beating in brachyuran and anomuran Crustacea. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.31:121–135.
    Cheer, A. Y. L., and M. A. R. Koehl. 1987. Paddles and rakes: fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms. J. Theor. Biol.129:17–39.
    Dusenbery, D. B. 1992. Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information., W. H. Freeman, New York.
    Free, J. B. 1987. Pheromones of Social Bees., Chapman and Hall, London.
    Grasso, Frank W. 2001. Invertebrate inspired sensory-motor systems and autonomous, olfactory-guided exploration. Biol. Bull.200:160–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Grasso, F. W., J. A. Basil, and J. Atema. 1998. Toward the convergence: robot and lobster perspectives of tracking odors to their source in the turbulent marine environment. Pp. 259–263 in Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE, Gaithersburg, MD.
    Ishida, H., Y. Kagawa, T. Nakamoto, and T. Moriizumi. 1996. Odor-source localization in the clean room by an autonomous mobile sensing system. Sens. Actuators B33:115–121.
    Ishida, H., T. Nakamoto, T. Moriizumi, T. Kikas, and J. Janata. 2001. Chemical sensors for plume tracing robots. Biol. Bull.200:222–226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Koehl, M. A. R., and J. R. Strickler. 1981. Copepod feeding currents: food capture at low Reynolds number. Limnol. Oceanogr.26:1062–1073.
    Lavalli, K. L., and J. R. Factor. 1995. The feeding appendages. Pp. 349–393 in Biology of the Lobster Homarus americanus, J. R. Factor, ed. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
    Nakamoto, T., H. Ishida, and T. Moriizumi. 1999. A sensing system for odor plumes. Anal. Chem.71:531A–537A.[Medline]
    Voigt, C. C.,O. von Helversen. 1999. Storage and display of odour by male Saccopteryx bilineata (Chiroptera, Emballonuridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.47:29–40.
    Weissburg, M. J. 2000. The fluid dynamical context of chemosensory behavior. Biol. Bull.198:188–202.[Abstract]
    Yen, J. 2000. Life in transition: balancing inertial and viscous forces by planktonic copepods. Biol. Bull.198:213–224.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Kamio, M. A. Reidenbach, and C. D. Derby
To paddle or not: context dependent courtship display by male blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1243 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
J. R. Mccall and K. S. Mead
Structural and Functional Changes in Regenerating Antennules in the Crayfish Orconectes sanborni
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2008; 214(2): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Denissenko, S. Lukaschuk, and T. Breithaupt
The flow generated by an active olfactory system of the red swamp crayfish
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4083 - 4091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Breithaupt and P. Eger
Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2002; 205(9): 1221 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Steullet, O. Dudar, T. Flavus, M. Zhou, and C. D. Derby
Selective ablation of antennular sensilla on the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus suggests that dual antennular chemosensory pathways mediate odorant activation of searching and localization of food
J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4259 - 4269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. E. J. Blazis and F. W. Grasso
Introduction
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 147 - 149.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
B. Webb
View From the Boundary
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. D. Derby and P. Steullet
Why Do Animals Have So Many Receptors? The Role of Multiple Chemosensors in Animal Perception
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 211 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
H. Ishida, T. Nakamoto, T. Moriizumi, T. Kikas, and J. Janata
Plume-Tracking Robots: A New Application of Chemical Sensors
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2001; 200(2): 222 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breithaupt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breithaupt, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Crustaceans
Right arrow Ecology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS