Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shrier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clay, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shrier, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroscience
Right arrow Crustaceans
Biol. Bull. 201: 186-192. (October 2001)
© 2001 Marine Biological Laboratory

Action Potentials Occur Spontaneously in Squid Giant Axons with Moderately Alkaline Intracellular pH

John R. Clay1,* and Alvin Shrier2

1 Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
2 Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G1Y6

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jrclay{at}ninds.nih.gov


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
This report demonstrates a novel finding from the classic giant axon preparation of the squid. Namely, the axon can be made to fire autonomously (spontaneously occurring action potentials) when the intracellular pH (pHi) was increased to about 7.7, or higher. (Physiological pHi is 7.3.) The frequency of firing was 33 Hz (T = 5°). No changes in frequency or in the voltage waveform itself were observed when pHi was increased from 7.7 up to 8.5. In other words, the effect has a threshold at a pHi of about 7.7. A mathematical model that is sufficient to mimic these results is provided using a modified version of the Clay (1998) description of the axonal ionic currents.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
The electrical response of squid giant axons in vivo to environmental stimuli can be characterized as being primarily phasic. For example, the axon fires an action potential once, and only once, in 15 °C seawater in response to a light flash, thereby triggering the rapid, jet-propelled escape of the animal (Otis and Gilly, 1990). A more complicated behavior of the axon occurs in concert with the parallel small axon system (Young, 1939) during the delayed jet escape from chemical stimuli applied at the olfactory organ (Otis and Gilly, 1990). Under these conditions the giant axon fires from one to three action potentials (or none at all). A reduction in temperature to 6 °C, which squid often encounter in deep waters, produces changes in the role of the axon in these behaviors (Neumeister et al., 2000). For example, the axon usually fires twice in response to a light flash at 6 °C (Neumeister et al., 2000). A tonic train of a relatively large number of action potentials does not appear to be elicited in vivo. These results are mirrored by the response of the axon in vitro to current stimuli applied with the standard axial wire recording technique. Under these conditions one, and only one, action potential is elicited with a rectangular current pulse, regardless of pulse duration or pulse amplitude (Clay, 1998). Moreover, an action potential is not elicited with a relatively slow depolarizing current ramp (J. R. Clay, unpub. obs.). A rapidly changing stimulus, such as a current step of sufficiently large amplitude, is required.

Given the above results, we were surprised to observe tonic firing of the axon when the pH of the perfusate used during recordings from intracellularly perfused axons was increased to 7.7, or higher. The normal intracellular pH (pHi) is 7.3 (Boron and DeWeer, 1976). Under these conditions of slightly elevated pHi, action potentials occurred spontaneously and repetitively. The activity lasted for as long as a few hours in some preparations. An ionic mechanism underlying this observation is proposed.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Experiments were performed on internally perfused squid giant axons at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, using standard axial wire voltage- and current-clamp techniques described elsewhere (Clay and Shlesinger, 1983; Clay, 1998). The intracellular perfusate consisted of 300 mM K glutamate and 400 mM sucrose, with the pH adjusted to the desired level within the 7.2 to 8.5 range by free glutamic acid. In a few experiments the intracellular buffer consisted of 400 mM sucrose, 250 mM KF, and 25 mM K2HPO4 (pHi = 7.6–7.8). The extracellular solution was either filtered seawater (pH = 7.5) or artificial seawater consisting of 430 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2). These extracellular solutions were used interchangeably given that similar results were obtained in either condition. The temperature was in the 4–6 °C range; in any single experiment it was maintained constant to within 0.1 °C by a Peltier device located within the experimental chamber. Input resistance measurements were made with rectangular current pulses applied to axons in extracellular medium containing tetrodotoxin (TTX, Sigma Chemical Co.) at a final concentration of 1 µM.

Computer simulations of membrane excitability were carried out as described previously (Clay, 1998). The model is given by

where V is membrane potential in mV, t is time in ms, C is the specific membrane capacitance (C = 1 µF · cm-2), Istim is the stimulus current (µA · cm-2), and the various ionic current components are described as follows. The sodium ion current is given as in Vandenberg and Bezanilla (1991) with

where gNa = 107 mS · cm-2, ENa = 64 mV, and PO is the probability that any single Na+ channel is in the open state of the Vandenberg and Bezanilla (1991) kinetic scheme. The various rate constants in the model (in ms-1) are as follows:

The potassium ion current is given by

where gK = 62.5 mS · cm-2, dn(V, t)/dt = -({alpha} + ß)n(V, t) - {alpha}, with {alpha} = -0.0075(V + 64)/(exp(-0.11(V + 64)) - 1) and ß = 0.075 exp(-(V + 62)/20). This represents a modification of the model of IK in Clay (1998) in which n4 kinetics were used. The {alpha} and ß parameters have also been modified so as to obtain equivalent (or better) descriptions of the IK results given by the n4 model in Clay (1998). The Ks parameter, which corresponds to the potassium ion concentration in the restricted space just outside of the axolemma, is given by

Further details concerning the description of the INa and IK components are given in Clay (1998). The background, or time-independent current in the model consists of three terms: the "leak" current, IL; a persistent, tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium ion current INaP (Rakowski et al., 1985); and an inwardly rectifying potassium ion current, IK,ir. The latter, together with INaP, confers nonlinearity to the background current in the -90 to -60 mV range, similar to that observed experimentally. These components are described by


where gL is either 0.2 (pHi = 7.3) or 0.03 (pHi 8.5). The formulation for INa,P represents a best fit, by eye, to unpublished measurements of this component kindly provided by R. F. Rakowski (Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School).

The simulations were implemented with a fourth-order Runga-Kutta iteration routine in FORTRAN with a time step of 1 µs.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
As noted above, the physiological intracellular pH for squid giant axons is 7.3 ± 0.013 (±SE; Boron and DeWeer, 1976). Under these conditions axons are quiescent with a resting potential of about -60 mV. An action potential elicited by a brief current pulse is shown in Figure 1A. A slight oscillatory rebound following the action potential was apparent, as indicated by the arrow in Figure 1A. The effect of changing the intracellular pH to 8.5 is illustrated in Figure 1B and C. A few minutes after the solution change, the membrane potential became oscillatory (inset, Fig. 1B). Moreover, it exhibited a much greater post-excitatory rebound (Fig. 1B). Several minutes later, the amplitude of the spontaneously occurring subthreshold oscillations increased, followed by a train of action potentials that lasted until the experiment was terminated. The result in Figure 1C occurred shortly after the change in pHi. Similar recordings were obtained at later times in these experiments by clamping the membrane potential at the equilibrium point and then slowly releasing the clamp. The membrane potential remained at the equilibrium point for a few seconds and then began to oscillate spontaneously. The oscillations increased in amplitude until an unending train of action potentials occurred, similar to the result in Figure 1C. Results such as those in Figure 1 were observed in 20 out of 24 axons in which the effect was investigated. The frequency of firing at T = 5 °C, the temperature at which several of the experiments were performed, was 32.9 ± 6.1 Hz (n = 8; ±SD).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Action potential from a squid giant axon in control conditions (pHi = 7.3) elicited by a 1-ms, suprathreshold current pulse. The arrow indicates a slight oscillatory rebound after the action potential. The inset illustrates a 100-ms epoch during rest (voltage scale 4x). (B) Action potential 2 min after changing to an intracellular buffer with pH = 8.5. The oscillatory rebound was considerably larger, and the membrane potential oscillated about the resting level (inset; voltage scale 4x). (C) Initiation of spontaneous firing of action potentials, about 3 min after the change to pHi = 8.5. The spontaneous activity in this preparation lasted 4 h, at which point the experiment was terminated.

 
The pHi effect was reversible, as illustrated in Figure 2. In this experiment, pHi was initially 8.3. The axon fired spontaneously (Fig. 2A). The intracellular perfusate was then switched to one having a pH of 7.7 (Fig. 2B). No clear effect on the electrical activity was observed 15 min after the solution change. When the intracellular buffer was changed to one having pH = 7.4, the activity ceased, although small-amplitude subthreshold oscillations were still observed (Fig. 2C). Spontaneous activity was reestablished when the initial perfusate (pHi = 8.3) was used (Fig. 2D). These results are consistent with a threshold (all-or-none phenomenon) for autonomous activity with pHi. The threshold was in the 7.6 to 7.8 range, as indicated by four experiments in which pHi was changed in 0.2 increments from pHi = 7.2 to 8.4.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Autonomous activity with pHi = 8.3 (A) and pHi = 7.7 (B). No clear effect was apparent with this change in pH. Spontaneous activity ceased with pHi = 7.4 (C), although subthreshold oscillations were apparent. (D) Spontaneous activity was re-established with pHi = 8.3. Different preparation than in Figure 1.

 
In three experiments on an unrelated topic, spontaneous firing was observed upon initiation of intracellular perfusion with a buffer consisting of 400 mM sucrose, 250 mM KF, and 25 mM K2HPO4 (pHi = 7.6–7.8). These results demonstrate that the effect was not a function of the buffering system. We primarily used K glutamate which, as Wanke et al. (1980a) noted, is appropriate at a concentration of 45 mM for pH in the 9 to 10.8 range. We found that a solution containing 300 mM K glutamate could be stably titrated (with free glutamic acid) down to pH 7.2, which allowed us to cover the pH range of interest (7.2 to 8.5) with a single buffer system containing an anion—glutamate—which is known to be "favorable" for squid giant axons (Adams and Oxford, 1983; Clay, 1988).

The most logical place, a priori, to look for the ionic mechanism underlying the pHi effect would seem to be the classical sodium and potassium ion currents, INa and IK, respectively, that underlie the action potential (Hodgkin and Huxley, 1952). We looked for an effect of a change in pHi on INa in voltage-clamp recordings with pHi in the 7 to 9 range, but we did not observe any clear effect. An irreversible reduction of INa inactivation does occur for a pHi greater than 9.5 (Brodwick and Eaton, 1978), which is outside the range of pHi we have used. Moreover, blockade of INa in squid axons by intracellular protons has been observed having pKa values of 4.6 and 5.8 (Wanke et al., 1980b)—an effect of pHi which, again, lies outside the range we have used. We are not aware of any report in the literature of an effect of a change in pHi in the 7 to 9 range on INa. No such effect was observed in this study.

An increase of pHi in the 7 to 9 range increases the amplitude of IK at any given depolarization from a holding level of -50 mV (Wanke et al., 1980a), although a similar effect does not occur with relatively negative holding potentials (-80 or -90 mV; Clay, 1990). This holding potential dependence is consistent with a rightward shift of the IK inactivation curve along the voltage axis as pHi is increased in the 6 to 10 range (Clay, 1990). The effect—essentially an increase in the number of K+ channels available for activation during the action potential—cannot account for pHi-induced automaticity (simulations not shown).

A clue to the ionic mechanism for pHi-induced automaticity was provided by input resistance measurements in axons made quiescent with tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1 µMFig. 3). The preparation illustrated in Figure 3A rested at -58 mV in TTX with pHi = 7.2. A hyperpolarizing current pulse 10 ms in duration produced a hyperpolarizing response having a time constant, {tau}, of 0.7 ms. In an equivalent circuit model of the membrane, this result is equal to the product of the membrane resistance and the membrane capacitance. The specific membrane capacitance is 1 µF · cm-2. Consequently, the specific membrane resistivity with {tau} = 0.7 ms is 0.7 k{Omega} · cm-2, a value that is consistent with the classical small-impedance measurements in figure 23 of Hodgkin and Huxley (1952). The corresponding result for pHi = 8.5 is shown in the bottom panel of Figure 3A. The change of pHi from 7.2 to 8.5 produced a slight hyperpolarization of rest potential by about 1 mV. The response to a current pulse of the same amplitude as in pHi = 7.2 produced a marked increase in membrane hyperpolarization with a much slower response time. Indeed, the response was not yet at the steady-state level at the end of the 10-ms pulse. Similar observations were made in four different preparations. This result is consistent with a reduction of net inward current, as illustrated schematically in Figure 3B. A hyperpolarizing current pulse having an amplitude of Ih intersects the current-voltage relation at a much more negative potential with pHi 8.5 as compared to pHi 7.2 (symbols (•) in Fig. 3B). This result suggests that a change of pHi might affect the third component of the Hodgkin and Huxley (1952) model of the action potential, namely the background, or "leak" current, IL. In particular, the resistance measurements in Figure 3 imply that the leak component is reduced by an increase in pHi. This idea has precedence in the work of Bevan and Yeats (1991), who reported the activation of a sustained, nonspecific cation conductance in a subpopulation of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons by extracellular protons. Alkaline pH would reduce the amplitude of this conductance.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of pHi on background ("leak") conductance. (A) Membrane potential responses to a 30 µA · cm-2 hyperpolarizing current pulse with pHi = 7.2 and 8.5, as described in the text. (B) Schematic description of the change in the current-voltage relation of the axon which is proposed to explain the results in panel A.

 
The background current in squid giant axons also consists of a small-amplitude tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium ion current (referred to as INaP) that is activated at relatively negative potentials, about -80 mV, and has a peak amplitude at -60 mV (Rakowski et al., 1985). This component has a current-voltage relation with a negative slope character at subthreshold potentials, whereas IL—a net inward current component at subthreshold potentials—has an approximately linear current-voltage relation. We are proposing that the reduction of IL with increasing pHi allows the negative slope character of INaP to destabilize the equilibrium point (rest potential) of the axon at -60 mV, thereby resulting in autonomous activity. We cannot exclude a pHi dependence of INaP. However, the pHi-induced change in resistance illustrated in Figure 3 is not attributable to changes in INaP, since those experiments were carried out in the presence of TTX, and as shown below, this resistance change is sufficient to explain the pHi-induced automaticity.

The mechanism we propose for the result in Figure 3 is illustrated by the simulations and current-voltage relations in Figure 4. These results are based on the equations provided in the Materials and Methods. The steady-state current voltage relation of the model for control conditions (pHi 7.3) for -90 < V < -55 mV is shown in Figure 3, along with an action potential (AP) elicited by a brief, suprathreshold current pulse. Only a single AP was elicited in the model even by relatively long-duration current pulses—regardless of pulse amplitude—as in the earlier analysis (Clay, 1998). The stability of the model for pHi 7.3 is illustrated by the current-voltage trajectory in the inset of Figure 3 immediately below the pHi 7.3 equilibrium point. In this simulation the membrane potential was abruptly shifted a few millivolts away from equilibrium conditions. The current-voltage trajectory subsequently spiraled toward the resting potential (stable focus). The effect of changing pHi to 8.5 is also shown in Figure 3. The sole change in the model was a reduction of the leak current conductance, gL, from 0.2 to 0.03 mS · cm-2. This change resulted in a hyperpolarization of the equilibrium point from -57.6 to -59.3 mV and a change in its stability properties from a stable to an unstable focus (inset above the voltage axis in Fig. 3). This trajectory spiraled toward a stable limit cycle, that is, autonomous firing, as illustrated by the inset to the left of the current-voltage trajectory, with a frequency of firing of 29.8 Hz.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Simulations of pHi-induced excitability. Steady-state current-voltage relations are shown for pHi = 7.3 and pHi = 8.5. The sole difference in the model for the two conditions is in the leak current conductance, which is 0.2 and 0.03 mS · cm-2 for pHi = 7.3 and 8.5, respectively. The equilibrium potential, that is, the point where the current-voltage relation crosses the voltage axis, is stable for pHi 7.3, as indicated by the trajectory in the inset adjacent to this point. (The scales are 5 mV and 2 µA · cm-2). An action potential elicited by a suprathreshold current pulse for this condition is shown below the current-voltage relation. (The scales are 50 mV and 1 ms.) The equilibrium point for pHi = 8.5 is unstable, as illustrated by the adjacent trajectory. (Same scales as the current-voltage trajectory for pHi = 7.3.) This trajectory spiraled out to the limit cycle described by the spontaneous action potentials shown adjacent to the current-voltage relation. Scales are 50 mV and 20 ms.

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Excitability of the squid giant axon preparation in vitro has traditionally been increased by reductions in the extracellular Ca2+ concentration (Huxley, 1959; Guttman and Barnhill, 1970). In preliminary experiments, we occasionally observed autonomous activity with 1/4 normal Ca2+ (2.5 mM), but the effect was transient and episodic. In all preparations examined, repetitive firing was not observed either autonomously or with current pulse stimulation 15–20 s after the change to an external medium that was low in Ca2+. Moreover, axons became inexcitable within a few minutes in low Ca2+ seawater. This result is not surprising given that low Ca2+ external medium is deleterious for neurons (Horn, 1999). The pHi-induced autonomous activity we report here is reproducible, robust, and long-lasting. In one axon, we observed stable repetitive firing for 4 h (with perfusion both intracellularly and extracellularly to maintain ionic gradients), at which point the experiment was terminated. Consequently, this preparation may be an ideal single-cell neuronal oscillator suitable for investigations concerning mechanisms of rhythmicity.

The ionic model that we propose for the spontaneous activity is novel and counterintuitive, in that the effect is attributable to a reduction of inward current, thereby leading to a destabilization of the rest potential by the INaP component. The result in Figure 2C illustrating subthreshold oscillations that increase in amplitude until the threshold for an action potential is reached is consistent with this aspect of the model. The only stable element both in the preparation and the model is the limit cycle, that is, the trajectory traversed in current-voltage space by the action potential (Winfree, 1980).

Repetitive firing in nerve cells is well known in a number of preparations, such as gastropod neuronal somata (Connor and Stevens, 1971). The rapidly inactivating potassium ion current, IA, is believed to play a major role in the activity (Connor and Stevens, 1971). The delayed rectifier, IK, in squid giant axons also inactivates, as originally shown by Ehrenstein and Gilbert (1966). We think that this kinetic feature does not play a role in our observations because the inactivation kinetics are shifted rightward along the voltage axis by an increase in pHi (Clay, 1990), and the onset of inactivation at 5 °C is too slow to be a factor during the relatively brief times the membrane potential is at depolarized potentials during the action potentials in the pulse train (Clay, 1989). Moreover, gK inactivation cannot account for the destabilization of the resting potential illustrated in Figure 1C, which we believe is the key feature underlying our results.

To our knowledge, the effect, reported here, of pHi on excitability in squid axons has not been previously reported. A similar effect with pHo was noted in passing by Bicher and Ohki (1972) in their work with intracellular pH electrodes. They observed an increase in excitability in the giant axon, including autonomous firing in some preparations, after the pH of the extracellular bathing medium was raised to 9. The change in pHo caused a few tenths rise in pHi, which we have shown to be sufficient to induce automaticity. It is tempting to speculate that our observations have physiological relevance, given that they occur within the normal range of pH in the ocean (7.5 to 8.4; Sverdrup et al., 1942), and only slightly above the normal, relatively alkaline, value of 7.3 in the axon (Boron and DeWeer, 1976). Moreover, transient rises in pH in squid blood have been reported in exercising squid (Pörtner et al., 1991), which, based on our work, would favor an increase in neuronal excitability. However, not enough is known about the role of pHi in squid behavior to make an informed conjecture about the role of the increased excitability in vivo, if it indeed occurs.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge grant support for this work from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (A.S.).


    Footnotes
 
Received 30 November 2000; accepted 28 June 2001.


    Literature Cited
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 

    Adams, D. J., and G. S. Oxford. 1983. Interaction of internal anions with potassium channels of the squid giant axon. J. Gen. Physiol.82:429–448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Bevan, S., and J. Yeats. 1991. Protons activate a cation conductance in a subpopulation of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J. Physiol. (Lond.)433:145–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Bicher, H. I., and S. Ohki. 1972. Intracellular pH electrode experiments on the squid giant axon. Biochim. Biophys. Acta255:900–904.[Medline]
    Boron, W. F., and P. DeWeer. 1976. Intracellular pH transients in squid giant axons caused by CO2, NH3, and metabolic inhibitors. J. Gen. Physiol.67:91–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Brodwick, M. S., and D. C. Eaton. 1978. Sodium channel inactivation in squid axon is removed by high internal pH or tyrosine specific reagents. Science200:1494–1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Clay, J. R. 1988. Lack of effect of internal fluoride ions on potassium channels in squid giant axons. Biophys. J.53:647–648.[Web of Science][Medline]
    Clay, J. R. 1989. Slow inactivation and reactivation of the K+ channel in squid axons. A tail current analysis. Biophys. J.55:407–414.[Web of Science][Medline]
    Clay, J. R. 1990. I,K inactivation in squid axons is shifted along the voltage axis by changes in the intracellular pH. Biophys. J.58:797–801.
    Clay, J. R. 1998. Excitability of the squid giant axon revisited. J. Neurophysiol.80:903–913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Clay, J. R., and M. F. Shlesinger. 1983. Effects of external cesium and rubidium on outward potassium currents in squid axons. Biophys. J.42:43–53.[Web of Science][Medline]
    Connor, J. A., and C. F. Stevens. 1971. Prediction of repetitive firing behavior from voltage clamp data on an isolated neuronal somata. J. Physiol. (Lond.)213:31–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Ehrenstein, G., and D. L. Gilbert. 1966. Slow changes of potassium permeability in the squid giant axon. Biophys. J.6:553–566.
    Guttman, R. S., and R. Barnhill. 1970. Oscillation and repetitive firing in squid axons. J. Gen. Physiol.55:104–118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Hodgkin, A. L., and A. F. Huxley. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane conductance and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. (Lond.)117:500–544.
    Horn, R. 1999. The dual role of calcium—Pore blocker and modulator of gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:3331–3332.[Free Full Text]
    Huxley, A. F. 1959. Ion movements during nerve activity. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.81:221–246.
    Neumeister, H., B. Ripley, T. Preuss, and W. F. Gilly. 2000. Effects of temperature on escape jetting in the squid Loligo Opalescens. J. Exp. Biol.203:547–557.[Abstract]
    Otis, T. S., and W. F. Gilly. 1990. Jet-propelled escape in the squid Loligo opalescens: concerted control by giant and non-giant motor axon pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:2911–2915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Pörtner, H. O., D. M. Webber, R. G. Boutilier, and R. K. O’Dor. 1991. Acid-base regulation in exercising squid (Illex illecebrosus, Loligo pealei). Am. J. Physiol.261:R239–R246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Rakowski, R., P. DeWeer, and D. Gadsby. 1985. Threshold channels can account for steady-state TTX-sensitive sodium current of squid axon. Biophys. J.47:A31.
    Sverdrup, H. U., M. W. Johnson, and R. H. Fleming. 1942. Pp. 194–195 in The Oceans, Their Physics, Chemistry, and General Biology. Prentice-Hall, New York.
    Vandenberg, C. A., and F. Bezanilla. 1991. A sodium channel gating model based on single channel, macroscopic ionic, and gating currents in the squid giant axon. Biophys. J.60:1511–1533.[Web of Science][Medline]
    Wanke, E., E. Carbone, and P. L. Testa. 1980a. K+ conductance modified by a titratable group accessible to protons from the intracellular side of the squid axon membrane. Biophys. J.26:319–324.[Web of Science][Medline]
    Wanke, E., E. Carbone, and P. L. Testa. 1980b. The sodium channel and intracellular H+ blockage in squid axons. Nature287:62–63.[Medline]
    Winfree, A. T. 1980. The Geometry of Biological Time., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Young, J. Z. 1939. Fused neurons and synaptic contacts in the giant nerve fibers of cephalopods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B229:465–503.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Paydarfar, D. B. Forger, and J. R. Clay
Noisy Inputs and the Induction of On-Off Switching Behavior in a Neuronal Pacemaker
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3338 - 3348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. R. Clay
On the Persistent Sodium Current in Squid Giant Axons
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 640 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shrier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clay, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shrier, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroscience
Right arrow Crustaceans


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS