|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The molecular details of GFP emerged about 20 years later (1996) from a pair of independent studies. The laboratories of Roger Tsien and George Phillips, Jr., showed the protein to be an unusual, very regular, barrel-shaped molecule, with its walls (a sheet comprising 11 ß-strands) and caps at both ends of the barrel enclosing and protecting a fluorophore composed of post-translationally modified amino acids.
The gene encoding GFP was cloned by Douglas Prasher and associates in 1992. And shortly thereafter (1994), Martin Chalfie and his laboratory showed that the protein, with its fluorophore, could be completely expressed in bacteria, which would (as if they were jellyfish) glow green when excited with blue light. In the same year, Tulle Hazelrigg demonstrated that a suitable gene construct would express a fusion protein including GFP, and that the site of expression could be precisely located in the organism (Drosophila in this case), or in a single cell, merely by illumination with blue light. With that critical finding, GFP was quickly recognized, and widely used in developmental, cell, neural, and molecular biology, as a reporter of gene expression and a marker for gene product localization.
Recently, Osamu Shimomura asked Shinya Inoué to produce a photomicrograph of the fluorescence emitted by the needle-shaped crystals of purified, native GFP. Inoué agreed, but thought to examine, as well, the anisotropic properties of the crystals. The novel and surprising results of that investigation are set out in the following short report by Inoué and Makoto Goda. In brief, the fluorescence from excited GFP crystals is polarized, with the resonance vectors oriented parallel to the long axis of the crystals. Moreover, when the excitation is also polarized, the fluorescence measured with an analyzer parallel to the crystal is very much higher (by 2030 times!) than that measured perpendicular to it.
These observations, combined with structural studies involving X-ray crystallography, should shed more light on GFP function and help us improve our interpretation of FRET imaging. Moreover they suggest that, in investigations where dynamic changes in the orientation of GFP-linked motor or contractile proteins are being followed, the use of polarized light might well increase the sensitivity of the observations.
The Editors
August 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |