Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, B. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Development
Right arrow Annelids
Biol. Bull. 201: 257-258. (October 2001)
© 2001 Marine Biological Laboratory

Phalloidin Labeling of Developing Muscle in Embryos of the Polychaete Capitella sp. I

Susan D. Hill and Barbara C. Boyer1

Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Capitella sp. I, previously considered part of the Capitella capitata complex (1), is a small polychaete annelid that can be maintained in culture with ease (J.P. Grassle, Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, pers. comm.). Lecithotrophic eggs are deposited in a maternal brood tube and can be readily harvested at different stages of development. Larvae emerge from the brood tube after approximately 8 days as many-segmented metatrochophores, each bearing a prototroch and telotroch, the classic trochophore stage being bypassed. The free-swimming metatrochophores are non-feeding and are competent to settle and metamorphose within a few hours of emergence. Metamorphosis in this species is not morphologically dramatic, but includes a pronounced elongation, loss of trochal bands and accompanying locomotory changes, and a transition from non-feeding to feeding. Postmetamorphic growth involves a general enlargement of the worm and addition of segments in a growth zone immediately anterior to the terminal pygidium.

The development of muscle patterns in soft-bodied bilaterian animals is not well understood, with most recent information coming from investigations of acoelomate flatworms (2,3) and the medicinal leech, a derived annelid (4,5). Segmentation between annelids and arthropods has traditionally been considered to be homologous; however, the recent assignment of annelids to the Lophotrochozoa and arthropods to the Ecdysozoa, brings this homology into question. A study of muscle development in a more ancestral annelid would be useful in furthering our understanding of the ontogenetic and evolutionary origins of segmentation, as well as the cellular interactions involved in muscle patterning and innervation during embryogenesis. To this end we are investigating early muscle development in Capitella sp. I. Staged embryos were removed from the brood tube and labeled with rhodamine-phalloidin following the procedure used by Reiter et al. (2) to detect actin filaments in developing muscle of turbellarian flatworms. Specimens were observed with an Olympus BX60 fluorescence microscope and imaged using an Olympus Magnifire digital camera (model S99860).

Muscle development proceeds from anterior to posterior. As the stomodeum forms, a ventral arc of muscle becomes apparent in the lower lip. Phalloidin binding continues dorsally until the mouth is surrounded (Fig. 1a). Approximately three days after fertilization, longitudinal muscles of the body wall begin to form. Initially eight longitudinal muscles appear in the following sequence: (1) four dorsal strands that will reach from the prostomium to the pygidium begin to develop; (2) two lateroventral muscles form at the lateral edges of the stomodeum (Fig. 1a), then come together at the apex of the prostomium (Fig. 1b); (3) these two lateroventral muscles also grow posteriorly, extending ventrally from the stomodeum into the pygidium (Fig. 1b); (4) medially, a second pair of midventral muscles (Fig. 1b) grows posteriorly from the stomodeum. Subsequently two additional lateral muscles form (Fig. 1b). Longitudinal muscles initially appear as thread-like single strands which thicken as more strands are added.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (a) Ventral view of an early embryo (240 x 175 µm) showing the stomodeum (S) with phalloidin labeling of the lower lip and lateroventral muscles (LV). (b) Ventral view showing the prototroch (P), telotroch (T), paired midventral muscles (MV), lateroventral muscles (LV), and lateral muscles (L). Circular musculature formation is incomplete, with a gap between the most posterior circular muscle band and the telotroch. (c) Ventrolateral view showing thickened midventral (MV) and lateroventral (LV) muscles. Circular muscle bands are complete to the telotroch. L = lateral muscle. (d) Metatrochophore showing greatly increased complexity of the larval musculature.

 
After initial differentiation of longitudinal muscles, circular muscles begin to develop, appearing first in the peristomial region. One band forms in the lateral stomodeal region, while a second passes immediately posterior to the stomodeum. Additional circular muscle bands are added sequentially from anterior to posterior corresponding to the metameric pattern of the developing larva (Fig. 1b, c). Development of circular muscles seems to be initiated in the ventrolateral region of the embryo, between the midventral muscles (MV) and the lateroventral muscles (LV). The circular muscles appear as complete bands ventrally before they are seen dorsally. A few closely spaced circular fibers also become visible in the telotrochal region. At this time there is a gap between the more anterior circular muscles and these telotrochal bands.

As development continues, both longitudinal and circular muscles become more massive with the addition of more strands. Circular muscle formation continues posteriorly (Fig. 1c), filling the gap between the developing circular muscles and telotrochal bands. The number of telotrochal bands also increases.

During larval development additional muscles—longitudinal, intrasegmental, oblique, setal sac fibers, etc.—are added so that the muscle pattern in newly emerged metatrochophores is very complex (Fig. 1d). Since metamorphosis occurs without major structural changes, these larval muscles form the basis of the adult musculature.

Mesoderm formation in polychaetes is attributed to two teloblasts, derivatives of the 4d blastomere, which reside between the posterior ectoderm and the lining of the developing gut (6). Segmentation is believed to occur as successive blocks of mesoderm are formed. Currently segmentation in polychaetes is being investigated in a number of laboratories (7,8,9) using several genetic markers. Our results show that the circular muscles that differentiate in the larval trunk anterior to the telotroch are iterated sequentially from anterior to posterior. We suggest that the phalloidin-staining telotrochal bands are the nascent segmental muscles of the growth zone.

This work was supported in part by the Union College Faculty Research Fund. The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous assistance of Dr. William Eckberg in creating the figure.

Footnotes

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308 Back

Literature Cited

  1. Grassle, J. P., and J. F. Grassle. 1976. Science, 192:567–569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Reiter, D., B. Boyer, P. Ladurner, G. Mair, W. Salvenmoser, and R. Rieger. 1996. Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol., 205:410–423.
  3. Ladurner, P., and R. Reiger. 2000. Dev. Biol., 222:359–375.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Jellies, J. 1990. Trends Neurosci., 13:126–131.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Jellies, J.,W. B. Kristan, Jr. 1988. J. Neurosci., 8:3317– 3326.[Abstract]
  6. Anderson, D. T. 1966. Acta Zool., Bd XLVII: 1–42.
  7. Seaver, E. C., and S. D. Hill. 1999. Am. Zool., 39:77A.
  8. Werbrock, A. H., D. A. Meiklejohn, A. Sainz, J. H. Iwasa, and R. M. Savage. 2001. Dev. Biol., 235:476–488.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Seaver, E. C., D. A. Paulso, S. Q. Irvine, and M. Q. Martindale. 2000. Dev. Biol. 195–209.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
A. Wanninger
Shaping the Things to Come: Ontogeny of Lophotrochozoan Neuromuscular Systems and the Tetraneuralia Concept
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2009; 216(3): 293 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
S. D. Hill and B. C. Boyer
HNK-1/N-CAM Immunoreactivity Correlates with Ciliary Patterns During Development of the Polychaete Capitella sp. I
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2003; 205(2): 182 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, B. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Development
Right arrow Annelids


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS