Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuzirian, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuzirian, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Neuroscience
Biol. Bull. 203: 197-198. (October 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

Effects of a Sensory Block on Calexcitin Levels in the Photoreceptors of Hermissenda crassicornis

Kimberly A. Borley1, Herman T. Epstein and Alan M. Kuzirian

Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
1 Ohio University, Athens, OH

The nudibranch mollusc Hermissenda crassicornis can be trained through classical Pavlovian conditioning to contract its foot (the conditioned response) when presented with light alone. If, between 5 and 55 min after conditioning, a sensory block (SB) is induced by inverting and re-righting animals, the expression of the conditioned response, when tested 90 min after training, will be inhibited. A similar inhibitory effect also will occur when the SB is given between 70 and 85 min after training (1). However, animals that receive the SB at 60 min post-training will demonstrate recall of the conditioned response when tested at 90 min. Thus, 60 min after training must be a key time in the formation of long-term memory in Hermissenda. To investigate the nature of this inhibitory effect further, animals that had a SB administered at 50, 60, or 65 min after conditioning were chemically fixed, and their central nervous systems were examined immunocytochemically for the protein calexcitin, a known mediator of learning.

Calexcitin is a GTP/Ca2+ binding protein that is present in the visual cells of Hermissenda (2) as well as in other specific but restricted areas of the brain (3). After calexcitin is phosphorylated by protein kinase C, it binds to the ryanodine receptors of the ER, triggering the release of internal Ca2+ stores. Concomitantly, calexcitin blocks the voltage-dependent outward K+ currents (IA; ICa-K). The release of Ca2+ from the ER into the cytosol and the blockade of K+ currents are believed to cause the enhanced long-lasting depolarization (LLD) that has been observed in photoreceptors of Hermissenda and shown to be necessary for learning and memory to occur in this animal (4). The intensity of calexcitin immunostaining has not only been shown to be higher in trained Hermissenda, but also appears to be positively correlated with the strength of the memory (3,5).

Specimens of Hermissenda were purchased from Sea Life Supply (Sand City, California) and adapted to laboratory conditions for 3 days. Previous research had shown that nine training events of classical Pavlovian conditioning are sufficient to initiate long-term memory (LTM) in Hermissenda when tested 90 min later (1). After 10 min of dark adaptation, the animals were conditioned with nine training events (TEs), in which they were exposed to 6 s of bright light (700 lux; conditioned stimulus, CS), paired, after a 2-s delay, with 4 s of horizontal orbital rotation (unconditioned stimulus, US). The inter-trial interval was 1 min. The animals reacted to the US by contracting their foot (unconditioned response; UR). Animals were tested with the light (CS) alone, and a positive learning response was indicated by a contraction of the animal’s foot (i.e., shortening of body length) with the CS alone; no change in length or elongation as in normal locomotory movement (6) meant that no learning had occurred.

For this study, four to six animals per group were given nine TEs as described above. A sensory block was applied to three groups of animals at 50, 60, and 65 min following training; the procedure was to turn the tray containing the animals upside down for 5 s and then to re-right it. As mentioned above, this additional vestibular stimulus had been demonstrated to interfere with the formation or completion of LTM in Hermissenda (1). After testing at 90 min, all animals were immediately removed from the training tray and submerged in 4% paraformaldehyde in Tris-buffered artificial seawater (Tris-ASW; pH 8.0). The animals’ brains were subsequently removed and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde in Tris-ASW. The brains were then washed, dehydrated in a series of increasing alcohol concentrations to 95% ethanol, embedded in polyethylene glycol-400-distearate, and sectioned (5 µm). Following de-waxing and rehydration, sections containing photoreceptors were immunolabeled for calexcitin using a polyclonal antibody (25U2; cloned from squid optic lobe and raised in rabbit; 1:1000 dil.) (3,5). A biotinylated horse anti-rabbit secondary antibody and avidin-bound microperoxidase (ABC method, Vector) were applied, followed by staining with the chromogen, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC). The negative control used was normal horse serum (NHS at 2%). NIH Image software was used to measure grayscale intensities from digital images of the original sections. Intensity levels were taken from areas of interest drawn around the cytoplasm of the B-photoreceptors of the eyes. That same perimeter was then transferred to an unstained area of the central neuropile to obtain background levels. The background readings were then subtracted from the photoreceptor values and the difference data analyzed statistically (ANOVA, Student’s t test).

The behavioral data (Fig. 1A) show that animals experiencing SBs at 50 and 65 min did not contract when tested with the CS alone at 90 min; they demonstrated no memory recall. However, when the SB was applied at 60 min and the animals tested at 90 min, these animals exhibited a positive learning response (memory recall); the SB was ineffective. From the previous study (1) and from experiments currently being conducted using transcription and translation inhibitors, this 60-min time point appears to define the establishment of LTM in Hermissenda. Thus, SBs applied before 60 min interfere with LTM formation, while SBs after 65 min interfere with the more permanent cellular changes of consolidated long-term memory (CLTM; work in progress).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) The behavioral responses of Hermissenda to a sensory block (SB) applied at either 50, 60, or 65 min following 9 training events (TE) of Pavlovian conditioning; 6 s of light (conditioned stimulus, CS) paired to co-terminate after a 2-s delay with 4 s of agitation (unconditioned stimulus, US) applied at 1-min intervals. Testing after 90 min with the CS alone produced a shortening of the animal’s body length (positive conditioned response [CR], negative change in body length). The sensory block consisted of rotating the tray containing the animals upside down for 5 s, re-righting it, and then testing as usual. SBs applied at 50 and 65 min inhibited the CR (positive change or elongation of body length), while its application at 60 min did not impede memory recall of the CR (body shortening). The 60-min time point, in Hermissenda, defines long-term memory (error bars = S.E.M.; n = 12–14 behavioral measures per condition from 4 animals each, 50, 65 min; 6 animals, 60 min). (B) The staining intensity of immunolabeling with the calexcitin antibody, 25U2, from the photoreceptors of the same animals trained, sensory blocked, and tested for Figure 1A. Animals demonstrating positive memory recall at 60 min despite the applied SB had the highest intensity levels for calexcitin. ANOVA and paired Student t values between SBs at 50, 65 min and naive, and 60 min indicated significant statistical differences (F = 3.34; t = 2.44, 2.91, 2.1; P < 0.05; n = 8–24 intensity measures per condition from 4, 4, 6, and 6 animals respectively).

 
This study revealed a significant difference between the intensity level of calexcitin immunostaining in animals that exhibited memory recall (SB 60 min) and those experiencing interference with recall (SB 50 min and SB 65 min) (Fig. 1B). These intensity results directly parallel the behavioral data of this and previous studies (1). These data showed that the intensity of immunostaining for calexcitin (i.e., intracellular concentration) was higher in trained animals that expressed positive associative conditioning (where long-term memory had been established). Thus, these data add to the body of evidence (3,4,5) suggesting that calexcitin is actively involved in the formation of various memory stages in Hermissenda as well as in some mammals (4), and that its intracellular concentration may directly modulate the process. The study further demonstrates that sensory blocks can be used to explore and define the temporal stages in memory development, especially from an evolutionary standpoint, in an animal, Hermissenda, that carries out sensory processing and memory formation within a well-defined and simple neural network.

The authors acknowledge Drs. Daniel Alkon and Tom Nelson, Blanchette Rockefeller Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Rockville, Maryland, for their support and for providing Hermissenda and calexcitin antibodies for this study. This work was supported in part by a NSF-REU Site Grant (9912287) to the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.

Literature Cited

  1. Epstein, D. A., H. T. Epstein, F. M. Child, and A. M. Kuzirian. 2000. Biol. Bull. 199: 182–183.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Nelson, T. J., S. Cavallaro, C.-L. Yi, D. McPhie, B. G. Schreurs, P. A. Gusev, A. Favit, O. Zohar, J. Kim, S. Beushausen, G. Ascoli, J. Olds, R. Neve, and D. L. Alkon. 1996. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 13,808–13,813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kuzirian, A. M., H. T. Epstein, T. J. Nelson, N. S. Rafferty, and D. L. Alkon. 1998. Biol. Bull. 195: 198–201.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Alkon, D. L., T. J. Nelson, W. Zhao, and S. Cavallaro. 1998. Trends Neurosci. 21: 529–537.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Kuzirian, A. M., H. T. Epstein, D. Buck, F. M. Child, T. J. Nelson, and D. L. Alkon. J. Neurocytol. (accepted, in revision).
  6. Epstein, H. T. 1997. Biol. Bull. 193: 255–257.[ISI]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
A. M. Kuzirian, H. T. Epstein, C. J. Gagliardi, T. J. Nelson, M. Sakakibara, C. Taylor, A. B. Scioletti, and D. L. Alkon
Bryostatin Enhancement of Memory in Hermissenda
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2006; 210(3): 201 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
A. M. Kuzirian, F. M. Child, H. T. Epstein, M. E. Motta, C. E. Oldenburg, and D. L. Alkon
Training Alone, Not the Tripeptide RGD, Modulates Calexcitin in Hermissenda
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2003; 205(2): 220 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuzirian, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuzirian, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Neuroscience


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS