Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wöllert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wöllert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Cell Biology
Biol. Bull. 203: 208-210. (October 2002)
© 2002 Marine Biological Laboratory

GTPase Rho Is Involved in Myosin-II-Mediated Contraction of Pseudo-Contractile Rings and Transport of Vesicles in Extracts of Clam Oocytes

Torsten Wöllert1, Ana S. DePina, Reid F. Thompson and George M. Langford

Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
1 Rostock University, Germany

Small GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) of the Rho family have been shown to regulate cytoskeleton reorganization, whereas G-proteins of the Rab family have been shown to regulate intracellular trafficking and vesicle transport (1). In mammalian cells, Rho proteins Rho/Rac/Cdc42 regulate the formation of stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. One of the ways in which Rho proteins mediate effects on the cytoskeleton is via the Rho-ROK/Rho kinase-myosin phosphatase pathway (Fig. 1A). In this pathway, myosin light-chain phosphatase (MyoP) is phosphorylated by ROK/Rho kinase and is thereby inhibited (2). The net result is the activation of myosin-II and the sustained contraction of smooth muscle cells, even after the Ca2+ concentration is decreased.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Diagram of signal transduction pathway involved in Rho-induced myosin II activation (left); RhoGDI blocks the exchange of GTP for GDP and blocks RhoGTPase activity (right). (B) The motile activities (moving vesicles/field/min) and the number of sliding actin bundles in control extracts and extracts in the presence of 200 nM RabGDI and 200 nM RhoGDI are shown. (C) The presence of actin filaments and bundles was verified by fluorescence microscopy (top row) for control extracts and extracts treated with RabGDI and RhoGDI. The same fields are shown by AVEC-DIC microscopy photographed 3 min earlier (bottom row).

 
To study the role of Rho proteins in cytokinesis in vitro, we inhibited Rho GTPases with Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) and measured the contraction of pseudo-contractile rings in M-phase extracts, which were obtained from clam oocytes. In these extracts, actin filaments spontaneously organized into a cooperative, 3-D network of interconnected filaments. We refer to this self-organized network of actin filaments as a pseudo-contractile ring because of the following two fundamental properties that it shares with the contractile ring: (i) it exhibits myosin-II-mediated, anti-parallel sliding of actin filaments (3,4), and (ii) it assembles during the M-phase of the cell cycle.

Fortuitously, actin filaments within the pseudo-contractile ring co-aligned to form bundles (10–20 parallel filaments) that were thick enough to visualize by AVEC-DIC microscopy. Therefore, sliding of actin filaments could be monitored and studied in networks reconstituted in vitro. The term contraction is used to refer to the myosin-II-mediated sliding of actin filaments in the network; the network itself does not shorten. In this report, we show that RhoGDI blocked filament sliding and vesicle transport in these extracts.

Extracts were prepared from mature oocytes obtained from gravid female clams. The cytoplasmic extracts were diluted 2-fold to a final protein concentration of about 15 mg/ml and clarified to remove large membrane aggregates. Nocodazole (30 µM) was added to the extracts to block microtubule assembly, an ATP regenerating system was added to maintain ATP levels, and the preparation was incubated for 45 min at 18 °C to assemble actin filaments and reconstitute motor activity. Rhodamine-phalloidin (0.5 µM) was added to stain the actin filaments, and the myosin-II motor activity was monitored by AVEC-DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

In control extracts, bundles of actin filaments in the pseudo-contractile ring (Fig. 1C, control) were observed to slide relative to each other. The advancing tips of sliding bundles were tracked at speeds greater than 0.2 µm/s for distances greater than 25 µm. An average of 2 sliding actin bundles/field/min were observed (Fig. 1B, control). In addition, movement of vesicles on actin filaments was observed. In a given video field that measured 25 µm2, 46 ± 2 vesicles/min (n = 2) moved at an average speed of 1.0 µm/s (Fig. 1B). The difference in speed of vesicle movement and filament sliding provided evidence that vesicle movement was not due to the passive attachment of vesicles to sliding filaments. In addition, vesicle movement was observed on stationary actin filaments tightly bound to the glass coverslip.

To determine the effect of RhoGDI on filament sliding and vesicle transport mediated by myosin-II, we incubated extracts with 200 nM bacterially expressed RhoGDI (gift from S. Kuznetsov). Vesicle transport was measured by counting the number of vesicles moving/video field/min (v/f/m; motile activity) at 15-min time intervals after GDI addition. RhoGDI inhibited motile activity by 72% (13 ± 1 v/f/m, n = 3) and filament sliding by 68% (Fig. 1B). Pseudo-contractile ring formation was similar to the controls (Fig. 1C). On the other hand, 200 nM RabGDI affected neither motile activity nor filament sliding; the motile activity and number of sliding filament bundles were similar to the controls (Fig. 1B). In addition, bundles of actin filaments in pseudo-contractile rings were similar to the control extracts (Fig. 1C). These studies showed that blocking Rho proteins with RhoGDI inhibited myosin-II-mediated vesicle transport and filament sliding. We conclude, therefore, that Rho proteins are required for contraction of the contractile ring during cytokinesis.

The generation of sliding forces between actin filaments is a well-established activity of bipolar filaments of myosin-II. Therefore the observation that actin filaments self-organized and moved in an anti-parallel fashion in these extracts fits current models of the contractile ring. These studies provide evidence that the two activities mediated by myosin-II in these extracts are activated by Rho GTPases. The downstream effector of the Rho proteins is most likely myosin light-chain phosphatase (5). Therefore, because inhibition of Rho proteins blocked cytokinesis, the Rho-ROK/Rho kinase-myosin phosphatase pathway appears to regulate cell division in clam oocytes.

Supported by NSF Grant IBN-0131470 and MBL Shifman award to RFT.

Literature Cited

  1. Matozaki, T., H. Nakanishi, and Y. Takai. 2000. Cell. Signalling 12: 515–524.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Kimura, K., M. Ito, M. Amano, K. Chihara, Y. Fukata, M. Nakafuku, B. Yamamori, J. Feng, T. Nakano, K. Okawa, A. Iwamatsu, and K. Kaibuchi. 1996. Science 273: 245–248.[Abstract]
  3. Wöllert, T., A. S. DePina, L. A. Sandberg, and G. M. Langford. 2001. Biol. Bull. 201: 241–243.[Free Full Text]
  4. DePina, A. S., and G. M. Langford. 1999. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47: 93–106.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Bishop, A. L., and A. Hall. 2000. Biochem. J. 348: 241–255.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
T. Wollert, A. S. DePina, C. J. DeSelm, and G. M. Langford
Rho-kinase Is Required for Myosin-II-Mediated Vesicle Transport During M-Phase in Extracts of Clam Oocytes
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2003; 205(2): 195 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wöllert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wöllert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molluscs
Right arrow Cell Biology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS