|
|
||||||||
Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
1 Reed College, Portland, Oregon.
2 SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
The American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, is a classic model for vision research. Not only are the lateral eyes of Limulus relatively simple, but they share many processes with the eyes of more advanced animals, including humans (1). The eyes of Limulus also exhibit a remarkable circadian rhythm: they become nearly 1,000,000-fold more sensitive at night, accommodating for the roughly 1,000,000-fold decrease in ambient light (2). Is visual sensitivity the only process controlled by a circadian oscillator in Limulus? Other marine animals have been shown to possess circadian as well as circatidal rhythms in locomotor activity (3). Does Limulus exhibit a rhythm in locomotor activity? Past attempts in this laboratory to determine the locomotor activity cycle of adult horseshoe crabs were largely unsuccessful, with only one of more than 100 crabs tested exhibiting circadian activity in darkness. Here we report a study to determine the locomotor activity rhythm of juvenile crabs. We found that most juveniles were nocturnally active under natural cyclic lighting, and that some maintain rhythmic activity in constant darkness.
We assessed the locomotor activity of 10 juveniles maintained in isolation. The animals were collected in the environs of Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and were placed in a 39 x 49-cm tank (water depth: 8 cm) filled with about 2 cm of sand. The tank was placed in a lightproof box with a porthole pressed directly against a laboratory window to provide natural light. The tank was continuously illuminated with infrared light sources (Sony: Model HVL-IRC) so that we could observe the activities of the animals day and night with a video camera (SeaView Video Technology, Inc.) sensitive to infrared light. Using Snappy Video Snapshot (Play, Inc.) hardware and SnapRecorder (SB Software) software, we took one picture per minute and measured activity with the following algorithm: if an animal moved onto an imaginary line drawn across the tank, it scored a point; if the animal turned approximately 120° or moved along the line at least one-half body length, it scored a point; if an animal remained in the same place on the line, crossed it without being caught on camera, or moved less than one-half body length along the line, no points were awarded. When collected in 30-min bins, activity scores ranged from 0 to 36. We considered scores of 9 or more to represent significant locomotor activity. When kept in constant darkness, the group was cyclically active with 77% of their daily activity occurring during their subjective night (data not shown). The period of the endogenous rhythm was about 23.5 h, which is less than 24 h, indicative of a circadian rather than a circatidal clock.
Did the circadian oscillators of all 10 crabs have the same period? Frame-by-frame inspection indicated that after a prolonged period of inactivity, one crab would become active first and was soon followed by the rest. We could not differentiate between crabs, so we do not know if an individual crab possessed the short period of 23.5 h and thus was an "early riser" who "woke up" all the rest. To answer this question we monitored the locomotor activity of five crabs separated into individual small plastic pens 15 cm in diameter. All five were predominantly active at night under cyclic lighting, but only two exhibited clear rhythmic activity in constant darkness.
Figure 1 plots the locomotor activity of an individual crab during 4 days in diurnal lighting and 9 days in constant darkness. The crabs activity was observed for 1-h periods and analyzed with a different algorithm: active 06 min, score = 0; active 649 min, score = 1; active 5069 min, score = 2. Figure 1 shows activity with a score of 2. Under diurnal lighting, the crab was nocturnally active; 91% of its activity occurred during the night. When placed in constant darkness, the crab remained cyclically active; 72% of its activity occurred during its subjective night. The endogenous rhythm appears to be drifting with a period of less than 24 h, but no firm conclusions can be drawn about the length of the period because we analyzed activity in 1-h bins. We conclude that circadian oscillators in Limulus modulate both visual sensitivity and locomotor activity. It is not known whether these processes are modulated by one or more circadian oscillators.
|
Literature Cited
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Chabot, S. J. Skinner, and W. H. Watson III Rhythms of Locomotion Expressed by Limulus polyphemus, the American Horseshoe Crab: I. Synchronization by Artificial Tides Biol. Bull., August 1, 2008; 215(1): 34 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Chabot, J. Kent, and W. H. Watson III Circatidal and Circadian Rhythms of Locomotion in Limulus polyphemus Biol. Bull., August 1, 2004; 207(1): 72 - 75. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |