Biol. Bull. Sign up for etocs!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cusato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ripps, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cusato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ripps, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell Biology
Right arrow Miscellaneous Vertebrates
Biol. Bull. 205: 197-199. (October 2003)
© 2003 Marine Biological Laboratory

An Experimental Approach to the Study of Gap-Junction-Mediated Cell Death

K. Cusato1, J. Zakevicius2 and H. Ripps2,*

1 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
2 University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL

* Corresponding author: harrripp{at}uic.edu

The vertebrate retina is a highly specialized sheet of neural tissue derived from an undifferentiated population of neural progenitor cells, which, upon completion of their final division, migrate to their laminar positions and differentiate (1). In the adult retina, almost every class of neuron and glial cell is linked to its neighbors by gap junctions—aqueous channels that allow the intercellular exchange of ions, second messengers, and other small molecules (<= 1 kDa). Thus, this communication pathway aids in the synchronization of cellular activity, and plays a significant role in maintaining cellular homeostasis (2). During development, however, many retinal cells undergo programmed cell death, or apoptosis, and both intracellular and intercellular communication are known to regulate the process (3). Indeed, we recently reported that gap junctions mediate a form of "bystander" cell death in the developing retina (4). Although this process is largely arrested in the mature retina, differentiated neurons and glia undergo apoptosis in neurodegenerative diseases (5), as well as in ischemia and trauma. In all of these cases, the spread of cell death from one dying cell to its otherwise unaffected neighbors (bystanders) may increase the total number of cells that enter the apoptotic pathway.

Because the retina is a complex tissue, some studies of bystander cell death are technically unfeasible at this time. We have developed a model system for the study of gap junction-mediated cell death using Xenopus oocytes which express an endogenous gap-junctional protein (connexin38, [Cx38]). Oocytes are paired at their vegetal poles following removal of their vitelline membranes and become electrically coupled via gap junctions. Because the Xenopus oocyte can serve to express many different connexins, the system should enable us to identify which gap junctional channels remain open under apoptotic conditions, to study the dynamics of gap junctional coupling during cell death, and to determine which molecules may pass from a dying cell to its neighbors to trigger the apoptotic process. Conversely, it is important to recognize that gap-junction-mediated cell death may result from the depletion of essential molecules (e.g., ATP) passing from the healthy cell to its dying neighbor.

Previous studies of single Xenopus oocytes have shown that microinjection of cytochrome c induces apoptotic cell death, accompanied by a progressive loss of membrane potential, activation of caspase 3, and DNA fragmentation (6). In the present study we have shown that injection of cytochrome c into one oocyte of a Cx38-coupled pair causes death in both the injected and noninjected cells over a period of 2–3 h (Fig. 1a,b). Pairs of oocytes preinjected with an antisense oligonucleotide to Cx38 did not exhibit bystander cell killing following cytochrome c injection; although the cell into which cytochrome c had been injected did die, its paired neighbor did not. Similarly, in cases where the cells were electrically coupled, but where the cytochrome c injected cell lysed in less than 40 min, the noninjected cell did not die (Fig. 1a,b, left pair). This result suggests that the intercellular channels joining the cytoplasm of the coupled cells must remain intact for longer than 40 min for bystander cell death to occur. It also indicates that bystander killing is not mediated by contact or by extracellular toxins, since the surviving cell continued to be in close apposition to the dying cell but remained intact. Vehicle injections failed to induce cell death in either injected or noninjected cells of electrically coupled pairs.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (a,b) Photographic images of two pairs of Xenopus oocytes that have been juxtaposed at their vegetal poles. The oocytes express an endogenous connexin (Cx38) and one member of each pair (asterisks) was injected with cytochrome c. Images were collected at 20 min (a) and 3 h (b) following cytochrome-c injection. Both cytochrome c-injected cells have undergone cell death (evidenced by lysis or cell swelling). Note that the noninjected cell in b (arrowhead in right pair) also showed clear signs of cell death, whereas the noninjected cell paired to an injected cell that had deteriorated completely in less than 40 min did not. (c) Currents recorded from paired oocytes under dual electrode voltage clamp, shortly after cytochrome c injection, illustrate that the cells are electrically coupled. The upper trace shows currents from a cell in which hyperpolarizing voltage steps (-100 to -20 mV) were applied, while the bottom trace shows currents from the coupled cell. (d) Same cell pair and same protocol 30 min later. Traces indicate that cells remain coupled despite loss of membrane integrity; note the greater currents required to maintain the cells in voltage clamp. (e) The time course of membrane potential changes recorded from a pair of oocytes expressing Cx38 following cytochrome c injection into one cell. Note the rapid loss of membrane potential in the injected cell and the slower changes associated with death of the bystander cell. See text for details.

 
Dual electrode voltage-clamp using GeneClamp 500 amplifiers controlled by pClamp 8 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) was used to monitor gap junctional coupling between cell pairs after injecting one of the cells with cytochrome c. The two cells were voltage-clamped to the same potential (-40 mV), voltage steps were applied to the noninjected cell, and the current responses of both cells were recorded (7). As shown in Figure 1 (c,d), cells remained electrically coupled despite the gradual death of the injected cell. In addition, we found that the loss of membrane potential resulting from cytochrome c injection reported by Bhuyan et al. (6) in single oocytes could be seen also in cell pairs. After injecting one cell with cytochrome c, both cells underwent membrane depolarization, with the injected cell losing membrane potential more rapidly following injection (Fig. 1e).

Although we have induced cell death by intracellular injection of cytochrome c, it is evident that the molecular mass of this apoptotic agent (13 kDa) is too great to pass through gap junctions (8). Clearly, cytochrome c itself cannot be the toxic substance carrying the death signal to bystander cells. Likewise, bystander killing is unlikely to be mediated by contact or diffusible substances, since antisense to Cx38 prevented bystander cell death, but not primary cell death. Of particular interest is the fact that gap junctional coupling persists during the apoptotic process, encouraging us to use the Xenopus oocyte and other expression systems in future experiments to identify the intercellular signals that pass between a dying cell and its coupled partners to induce bystander cell death.

These studies were conducted at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and were supported by grants from the NIH (HR: EY-06516 and EY-01792; KC: HL-07675); a Grass Foundation Fellowship (KC); an unrestricted award to the UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.; a Senior Research Investigator Award from the RPB (HR); and an Award of Merit from the Alcon Research Institute (HR).

Literature Cited

  1. Robinson, S. R. 1991. Pp. 69–128 in Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol 3: Neuroanatomy of the Visual Pathways and their Development, B. Dreher and S. R. Robinson, eds. Macmillan, London.
  2. Andrade-Rozental, A. F., R. Rozental, M. G. Hopperstad, J. K. Wu, F. D. Vrionis, and D. C. Spray. 2000. Brain Res. Rev. 32: 308–315.[Medline]
  3. Linden, R. 2000. Brain Res. Rev. 32: 146–158.[Medline]
  4. Cusato, K., A. Bosco, R. Rozental, C. A. Guimarães, B. E. Reese, R. Linden, and D. C. Spray. 2003. J. Neurosci. 23: 6413–6422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ripps, H. 2002. Exp. Eye Res. 74: 327–336.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Bhuyan, A. K., A. Varshney, and M. K. Mathew. 2001. Cell Death Differ. 8: 63–69.[Medline]
  7. Dahl, G., T. Miller, D. L. Paul, R. Voellmy, and R. Werner. 1987. Science 236: 11,290–11,293.
  8. Bennett, M. V. L., V. K. Verselis, R. L. White, and D. C. Spray. 1988. Pp. 287–304 in Gap Junctions, E. L. Hertzberg, and R. G. Johnson, eds. Liss, New York.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cusato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ripps, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cusato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ripps, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell Biology
Right arrow Miscellaneous Vertebrates


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS