Biol. Bull.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Development
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Cnidarians
Biol. Bull. 207: 130-140. (October 2004)
© 2004 Marine Biological Laboratory

Predation Resistance and Nematocyst Scaling for Metridium senile and M. farcimen

Andrew Kramer1 and Lisbeth Francis2,*

1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
2 Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1700 Shannon Point Rd., Anacortes, Washington 98221-4042

* To whom correspondence should be addressed


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Summary
 Literature Cited
 
Previous studies suggest that large body size reduces the risk of predation for acontiate sea anemones. For two species of Metridium, we found significant increases in the length of the acontial threads and in the mean lengths of the unfired acontial nematocyst capsules, with increasing body size. This supports the hypothesis that more damaging acontial defenses protect larger acontiate anemones from their predators. Metridium is planktivorous, and food size does not increase substantially with body size; so we expected smaller increases in nematocyst size for the feeding tentacles. In fact, scaling exponents were significantly smaller for the tentacle nematocysts than for acontial nematocysts of the same types in 3 out of 4 cases. This suggests that nematocyst scaling responds predictably to selection pressure. When specimens of the same size were compared, the non-clonal, subtidal species, M. farcimen, had significantly larger acontial nematocysts than did its clonal congener, M. senile, which lives at the upper tidal limits for major subtidal predators in the northeastern Pacific. Therefore, larger acontial nematocysts may be particularly advantageous where predation levels are high. These data demonstrate that closely related anemone species can be distinguished on the basis of ecologically and functionally relevant differences in nematocyst scaling.

Abbreviations: a & b, intercept and slope of the log-log plot • OLS, ordinary least squares regression estimate of line fit • RMA, reduced-major axis estimate of line fit • 95% CI, ninety-five percent confidence intervals (for slope and intercept estimates) • %SEE, percent standard error of estimate


   Introduction
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Summary
 Literature Cited
 
Predation is one of the strongest evolutionary pressures on many organisms, favoring a diverse suite of adaptations that reduce predation risk (Curio, 1976; Vermeij, 1982; Sih, 1985, 1987; Bronmark and Miner, 1992). Larger body size often decreases vulnerability to predation (Paine, 1976; Tripet and Perrin, 1994; Arsenault and Himmelman, 1996; Lundvall et al., 1999) because predators are physically unable to consume larger prey (Tripet and Perrin, 1994; Arsenault and Himmelman, 1996), or because larger prey are able to escape or to retaliate more effectively (Harris, 1986; Arsenault and Himmelman, 1996; Christensen, 1996; Lundvall et al., 1999).

Acontiate sea anemones have specialized antipredator defenses. When attacked, the anemones contract and extrude many long, thread-like mesenterial filaments (the acontia) through the mouth and column wall (Hyman, 1940). The acontia are ciliated and motile, bearing densely packed tracts of large specialized nematocysts that fire on contact with predators. Damage from such contacts may dissuade a predator from continuing the attack (Harris, 1973; Edmunds et al., 1976; Shick, 1991). The three types of nematocysts found in acontia (basitrichs, microbasic b-mastigophores, and microbasic amastigophores) are also found in the feeding tentacles; but the b-mastigophore and amastigophore found in the acontia are more than twice the size of the tentacle cnidae (Hand, 1956).

Three acontiate anemones in the genus Metridium co-occur in the Pacific Northwest. The two studied here, M. senile (Linnaeus, 1761) and M. farcimen (Tilesius, 1809), differ in growth form and habitat preference. M. senile is smaller, and predominantly intertidal in the Pacific Northwest. M. senile replicates asexually by pedal laceration, and usually occurs in large, genetically identical clonal groups (Bucklin, 1987b). M. farcimen grows much larger; is found only in subtidal habitats (Fautin et al., 1989); and does not replicate asexually, occurring as solitary individuals or as congregations of genetically distinct individuals (Bucklin, 1987a). Originally assumed to be an aclonal morph of M. senile (Hand, 1956), M. farcimen was shown through molecular analysis to be an independent species (Bucklin and Hedgecock, 1982) and its original name was reapplied by Fautin and Hand (2000). The third species, M. exilis, is a very small anemone that lives only in intertidal areas and forms clonal aggregations through binary fission (Hand, 1956).

Both laboratory studies and field observations suggest that Metridium becomes less vulnerable to predation with increasing body size. An important predator, the sea slug Aeolidia papillosa, shows a strong preference for small individuals of M. senile in choice experiments (Harris, 1976; Harris and Duffy, 1980). Furthermore, Harris (1973, 1991) found that A. papillosa is more likely to attack small individuals in an aggregation and, as a result, selects strongly for larger body size. Another key predator, the leather star Dermasterias imbricata, readily consumes small specimens of M. senile in the laboratory (Annett and Pierotti, 1984).

Body size of Metridium generally increases along a gradient from intertidal to subtidal habitats, mirroring an increase in density of both A. papillosa and leather stars. The presence of large individuals of Metridium sp. in the subtidal zone where predation pressure is more intense suggests a size refuge from predation (Annett and Pierotti, 1984; Harris, 1991).

Several possible explanations could account for the decreased vulnerability to predation of larger specimens of Metridium. Larger anemones may simply exceed the mechanical constraints of predator feeding mechanisms. This seems likely for the sea stars, which must settle on top of their prey (Annett and Pierotti, 1984). However, A. papillosa feeds by biting off pieces of the anemone in a manner not obviously limited by anemone size (Edmunds et al., 1976).

If larger anemones have better defense mechanisms, this might contribute to the increased resistance of larger anemones to predation. Edmunds et al. (1974) found that anemone species that lack acontia were preferred over acontiate species by A. papillosa, suggesting that the acontia may provide effective defense against this predator. Harris (1973, 1986) reported that acontial defenses could dissuade A. papillosa from feeding and could even result in the death of the sea slug. He noted that this defense mechanism appeared to be related to the size of the anemone (Harris, 1986).

In a companion study, Francis (2004) shows how scaling analysis can be used to detect evolutionary changes in cnida size and shape by comparing homologous cnida populations from different anemone tissues and species. Here we look at the scaling of acontium length, acontium diameter, and mean capsule size of the two large acontial nematocysts (amastigophores and b-mastigophores). Strong positive correlation of any or all of these variables with body size would support the argument made by Harris (1986) that large anemones are less vulnerable to predation because they defend themselves more effectively against predators. In addition, because the larger-bodied, non-clonal species, M. farcimen, lives in deeper water where predators are more abundant, we also expected stronger antipredator defenses in M. farcimen than in the smaller-bodied and clonal M. senile.

In designing the scaling study, we predicted relatively rapid increase in the size of the large acontial nematocysts with increasing body size, due to ongoing directional selection caused by predation. By contrast, we expected relatively little increase in the size of these same two nematocyst types in the feeding tentacles. Because prey size does not increase significantly with body size for Metridium (Sebens, 1981), nematocysts involved primarily in food capture and handling should be subjected to stabilizing selection.


   Materials and Methods
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Summary
 Literature Cited
 
Specimen collection and handling
Between 15 June and 1 August 1999, we collected specimens of Metridium farcimen on the boat dock at Skyline Marina, Anacortes, Washington (48°30'N, 122°41'W) and specimens from a single M. senile clone on the Schwarz boat dock, Garrison Bay, on San Juan Island (48°35'N, 123°10'W). A clonal sample is ideal for isolating the effects of body size independent of genetic variation. Anemones were deliberately chosen to provide an even distribution of body sizes spanning the available size range. At Shannon Point Marine Center, Anacortes, Washington, the anemones attached to the tank or to glass bowls in a continuous-flow sea table, where they were fed pieces of frozen cod once or twice a week.

Body-size measurement
Within 2 weeks, we weighed the living anemones on a Mettler P1200 balance after blotting them to remove as much excess water as possible. Because these soft-bodied animals are continually changing shape by taking in and expelling large quantities of seawater, blotted wet weight provides a nondestructive basis for comparing polyp sizes that is more reliable than linear dimensions. For example, the diameter of the expanded oral disc can vary greatly with the degree of expansion of the anemone; and the relationship between oral disc size and tissue volume may vary considerably between species. Daily measurements of 10 individuals (M. senile) over a 3-day period indicated that wet weights were reproducible within ± 10%.

Nematocyst size measurement
Several extruded acontia or excised tentacles were fixed in 1–2 ml of 10% formalin to prevent nematocyst discharge. The tissues were disrupted using a glass tissue grinder to randomly mix and disperse the sample.

A drop of this nematocyst mixture was scanned systematically with non-overlapping fields (method of Williams, 1996), and maximum capsule lengths and widths of the first 20 each of the unfired b-mastigophore and amastigophore capsules were measured (method of Hand, 1954) using 400x magnification and a video image analysis system (Optimax software package). Means and their standard errors were calculated for each sample of 20 capsules. Duplicated measurements using 20 video images indicated that capsule dimensions were reproducible within ± 2% (length) and ± 5% (width).

Extended acontia measurement
To provide comparative estimates of acontial length for specimens of different size, we removed each anemone from the tank and held it upside down, which caused extrusion of the acontia. When the strand was fully extended under the pull of gravity, we measured the length from the oral sphincter to the most distal tip, which we called the extended acontia length.

To measure acontium diameter, we gently removed a single extruded acontial thread from each individual, placed it on a slide with a drop of seawater and coverslip, and measured the diameter (width) of an undamaged portion at 100x. Daily measurements of 10 individuals (M. senile) over a 3-day period indicated that acontium lengths and acontium diameters were reproducible within ± 31% and ± 13%, respectively.

Statistical analyses
Untransformed data were used to examine the relationship between body size and the other measurements obtained from each individual. For ease of interpretation, the graphs all use linear scale on the abscissa (mean nematocyst capsule dimensions, acontium diameter, and effective acontial length) and log scale on the ordinate (wet weight), as in Longley (1984) and Francis (2004). This makes it easier to display the standard errors of the means and to assess the magnitude and possible biological relevance of any between-sample differences (Smith, 1984).

Data were log-transformed (base 10) for statistical analyses, a common practice in scaling studies where the relationship is well represented by a power function (Huxley, 1932; Smith 1984) as would be predicted here by simple dimensional analysis (LaBarbera, 1989; Francis, 2004).

We calculated Spearman rank correlations for the relationship between anemone wet weight and each of the other metrics, using the NCSS software package, ver. 2000 (Hintze, 2001); and significance at P = 0.05 was determined using sequential Bonferroni adjustment within groups of related tests (Rice, 1989). A nonparametric test for correlation is most appropriate for determining the significance of these relationships because the wet weights are not normally distributed and there is error in both the dependent and independent variables. Thus the data do not meet the assumptions of ordinary least squares regression (OLS; Sokal and Rohlf, 1981; Rayner, 1985).

For describing functional relationships such as these, McArdle (1988) showed that reduced major axis regression (RMA) provides a more robust estimate of the slope (bRMA = scaling exponent = bOLS/R = SDy/SDx) than does OLS, where values for Pearson’s product moment correlation (R) are less than 0.9 and the error for X is more than one-third that of the Y variable (probably true, here). OLS consistently underestimates these slopes. Note, also, that OLS and RMA estimates converge as R increases, and that the variance and standard error are numerically the same for RMA and OLS estimators (McArdle, 1988). R and the percent standard error of estimate (%SEE; Smith, 1984) provide measures for goodness of fit.

RMA estimates and 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the slopes and intercepts were generated by bootstrapping each data set 10,000 times using SYSTAT, ver. 9 (SPSS, 1998), selecting the median values to estimate slopes and intercepts, and selecting the 250th and 9750th values as the upper and lower 95% confidence values. Bootstrapping provides estimates without assumptions about data distribution, and these estimates agree to three decimal places with coefficients calculated directly from sample statistics.

Because the data do not meet the assumptions for a Model I ANOVA (or ANCOVA), we use the bootstrapped confidence intervals to compare slopes and intercepts (M. LaBarbera, Univ. of Chicago, pers. comm.). By definition, two slopes are significantly different at the 0.05 level if each mean is outside the 95% CI of the other; however, it is necessary to be aware of the possibility for multiple testing error (Hess, 1993).


   Results
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Summary
 Literature Cited
 
Scaling of acontia
Extended acontia length increased significantly with body size for both Metridium species (Fig. 1A, Table 1); and it increased more rapidly than would be predicted for isometric scaling (positive allometry). The predicted null value for isometric scaling of dimensions relative to mass (0.33) is outside the 95% confidence intervals for both species (Table 1). An empirically measured scaling exponent for pedal disc diameter as a function of ash-free dry weight (mass) in M. senile (0.36) also lies outside the 95% CIs (Sebens, 1981).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. (A) Extended length and (B) thread diameter of the acontia vs. anemone wet weight. Data are a single measurement for each specimen. The scale for wet weight is logarithmic, and the scales for acontial dimensions are linear. Correlations with wet weight were all significant (P < 0.05 for groupwide error; Spearman rank correlation with sequential Bonferroni correction).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Acontium dimensions: scaling constants for Metridium farcimen and M. senile, from reduced major axis regression equations

 
By contrast, acontium diameter showed negative allometry; that is, increase in the diameter of the acontial threads with increasing body size was significantly less than the null prediction based on isometric scaling (Fig. 1B, Table 1). Positive correlation with body size was significant for M. farcimen but not for M. senile, after adjusting for multiple comparisons (Table 1).

Scaling of nematocyst capsules
For acontial nematocysts, mean lengths of the unfired nematocysts were significantly correlated with body weights for both nematocyst types and in both anemone species (Table 2). Scaling exponents for the four acontial nematocyst populations were not significantly different from one another (0.035 to 0.051; Fig. 2, Table 2). Again, the null expectation of isometry was rejected using 95% CIs. Nematocyst capsule lengths scale much more slowly than predicted based on the null scaling exponent (0.33).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Nematocyst lengths: scaling constants for Metridium farcimen and M. senile, from reduced major axis regression equations

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Mean length (± 1 SE) of unfired nematocyst capsules vs. anemone wet weight for (A) b-mastigophores and (B) amastigophores from the tentacles (triangles) and acontia (squares) of Metridium farcimen (unfilled shapes) and M. senile (filled shapes). Means and their standard errors are based on systematic samples of 20 unfired capsules from each tissue of each specimen. Correlations of each individual’s mean capsule length with wet weight are significant for all acontial nematocysts and tentacle nematocysts except b-mastigophores from M. farcimen (P < 0.05 for groupwide error; Spearman rank correlation with sequential Bonferroni correction).

 
By contrast, mean widths of the unfired capsules were not significantly correlated with body size for any of the acontial nematocysts (Fig. 3, Table 3).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Mean width (± 1 SE) of unfired nematocyst capsules vs. anemone wet weight for acontial nematocysts. Correlations with wet weight are not significant for any of the populations (P < 0.05 for groupwide error; Spearman rank correlation with sequential Bonferroni correction).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 Nematocyst widths: scaling constants for Metridium farcimen and M. senile, from reduced major axis regression equations

 
For the tentacle nematocysts, mean length of the unfired capsules was significantly and positively correlated with body size for all cases except one. Change in capsule length was not correlated with body size for the tentacle b-mastigophores of M. farcimen (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Tissue differences in nematocyst scaling
Acontial nematocysts were consistently longer than tentacle nematocysts of the same type (Figs. 2 and 4), and scaling exponents were significantly higher for the acontial nematocysts in 3 cases out of 4 (Fig. 2; 95% CI, Table 2). The exception was M. senile, where 95% CIs for tentacle and acontial amastigophores overlapped (Fig. 2, Table 2).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Microbasic b-mastigophores and microbasic amastigophores from the acontia and tentacles of two anemone species. Average-sized nematocysts were selected from 2.5-g specimens of Metridium senile (to the left; A, B, E, and F) and M. farcimen (to the right: C, D, G, and H). Acontial nematocysts (A, B, C, and D) are much larger than tentacle nematocysts from the same specimens (E, F, G, and H). Amastigophores (A, C, E, and G) are shown to the left of b-mastigophores (B, D, F, and H) from the same tissues. In life, the tubule end of the capsule (pointing upward in these photographs) is close to the outer cell surface of the acontial gastrodermis. Photographs were taken using differential interference contrast at 1000x (oil immersion). Scale bar: 10 µm.

 
Species differences
Scaling exponents were indistinguishable for homologous nematocyst populations from the two Metridium species (Table 2, overlapping 95% CIs for RMA estimates of the slopes for capsule length vs. wet weight). When specimens of the same size were compared (narrow allometry, sensu Smith, 1984), mean capsule length was always greater for M. farcimen than for M. senile (Fig. 2); and these differences in elevation were significant (Table 2, non-overlapping 95% CIs for intercepts).


   Discussion
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Summary
 Literature Cited
 
Because predators prefer to eat smaller specimens of Metridium, Harris (1986) suggested that the effectiveness of specialized antipredator defenses may vary with anemone size. Our data support this hypothesis. The extended length and diameter of the acontial threads themselves and the capsule lengths of the large acontial nematocysts (b-mastigophores and amastigophores) were all positively correlated with body size.

Effectiveness of the acontia as predator deterrents presumably is related to the pain and damage caused to a potential predator and increases with the number and potency of nematocysts brought into contact with that predator. Thus, more acontial threads, longer acontia, more nematocysts, and larger acontial nematocysts should all improve deterrence.

Larger anemones have more and bigger acontia than smaller conspecifics
Potential effectiveness of the acontia as deterrents should be a function of total nematocyst-bearing area, which is proportional to the diameter of each acontial thread, multiplied by the length of the thread, number of threads, and nematocyst density. Part of the increase in total nematocyst-bearing area as anemones grow occurs because the acontia connect to the inner edge of the mesenteries, and larger anemones have more mesenteries (Stephenson, 1928).

Larger anemones also have longer acontia (Fig. 1, Table 1) that can be extended farther, and thus are more likely to contact a predator. Longer acontia also carry more nematocysts and have more surface to wrap around a prospective predator. The length of the acontial threads increases more rapidly with body size (scaling exponents 0.45 and 0.60) than the null expectation (scaling exponent 0.33). This positively allometric relationship suggests that relatively rapid increase in acontial length with increasing body size (and increasing energy supply; Sebens, 1981) has been favored by natural selection in both Metridium species (Fig. 1A).

Acontium diameter, another factor in total nematocyst-bearing area, also increases with body size, but this relationship is negatively allometric. That is, as body size increases, acontium thickness increases less rapidly (Fig. 1B, scaling exponents 0.14–0.25) than external body dimensions such as foot diameter (0.36; Sebens, 1981) or the null expectation of isometry (0.33), and much less rapidly than acontium length (0.45 and 0.60). A less rapid increase in this aspect of acontial structure seems to favor deployment advantages over structural strength or maximum increase in contact area. A relatively narrow acontial thread can be more flexible than a very thick thread, bending more readily with water currents and wrapping more easily around a predator’s fine morphological features such as the cerata of a slug. While a relatively thin thread is likely to detach from the anemone more easily, the acontia appear to be disposable structures. Acontial nematocysts continue to fire after the acontial threads have become detached (pers. obs.).

Notably, only part of the acontial thread is nematocyst-bearing: the ciliated tract is dedicated to acontium mobility. It would be interesting to know whether these regions increase proportionally with increasing anemone size.

Size and potential effectiveness of acontial nematocysts increases consistently with body size
In the acontia, mean unfired capsule length of both nematocyst types increases as a function of wet weight, continuing to increase for the entire range of individuals sampled (Fig. 2). Capsule length is highly correlated with body size for both acontial nematocyst types in both Metridium species (Table 2). This increase in mean capsule lengths is substantial over the size ranges of anemones sampled and is likely to be biologically relevant. For this sample of M. farcimen, mean length of the acontial nematocyst capsules increases by 25%–29% for a 750-fold increase in body weight. For M. senile, a 70x increase in weight results in a 14%–23% increase in the mean length of the acontial nematocysts.

Longer nematocyst capsules can carry more toxin and a longer barbed tubule. The longer the barbed tubule, the more likely it is to succeed in penetrating the tissue of a prospective predator, and the deeper it can penetrate, increasing the potential for mechanical damage during penetration and deep damage by toxins.

Larger anemones do not have substantially wider acontial nematocysts. For M. farcimen, the actual increase in mean capsule width for the acontial b-mastigophores is only 2.6% for a 750-fold increase in body weight. For M. senile, there is no net increase in the mean width of the acontial nematocysts over the 70-fold increase in body size for this sample.

Differences between the two Metridium species reinforce the case for a causal relationship linking predation pressure to anemone size and nematocyst size
The acontial nematocysts of M. farcimen are consistently larger than those of M. senile for specimens of similar size across the entire range of overlapping body size (Fig. 2A). This can be seen as an extension of the pattern observed within each species individually.

Since M. farcimen is exclusively subtidal, it presumably is subjected to higher predation from subtidal predator species than is M. senile, especially at small body size. In the Pacific Northwest, M. senile lives primarily in the intertidal and on pilings, floats, and docks at protected sites where the threat of predation, especially by the leather star, probably is much less. If larger acontial nematocysts increase survival and fitness in the presence of such predators, selection will usually be stronger for M. farcimen than for M. senile. This may explain why the acontial nematocysts of M. farcimen are larger than those of M. senile, for specimens of the same size. Sampling additional M. senile clones is necessary to determine whether the size difference is consistent across different habitats and genotypes.

We demonstrate for the first time that scaling studies using data on cnida size and anemone body size can be useful for distinguishing between closely related species, even when the size ranges for homologous cnida populations are overlapping. Fautin et al. (1989) stated that "nematocysts do not appear to differ consistently between the two [M. farcimen and M. senile], their size seemingly correlated more with size than species of the individual." In fact, when specimens of the same size are compared, there are large and significant differences in the mean sizes of the acontial nematocysts from the two Metridium species. The cnida size data for the M. senile clone are well outside the expected range of M. farcimen for all four nematocyst populations. Under any reasonable assumption about the position of the clonal data within the M. senile population data (based on the 95% CI for the intercept of the M. farcimen data on capsule length), M. senile has shorter mean nematocyst lengths for 4 out of 4 sampled cnida populations. Thus this is a robust result that we predict will be confirmed when a wider sample of genotypes from M. senile is examined.

Acontial nematocysts in other species scale similarly
Stephenson (1929, his tables I and II) reported mean lengths and widths for two nematocyst types, "penicilli" (probably amastigophores) and "spirulae" (probably b-mastigophores), from the acontia of Sagartia elegans (30 capsules per type for each of 12 specimens) and Cereus pedunculatus (30 capsules per type for each of 7 anemones—2 newly released, brooded young and 5 adults). Stephenson stated that his data showed no consistent relationship between body size and nematocyst size. In fact, mean cnida lengths are significantly correlated with body size for all four of his acontial cnida populations; and mean capsule widths are significantly correlated with body size for 1 of the 4 (Spearman rank correlation, our Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4 Lengths and widths of acontial nematocysts: scaling constants for Sagartia elegans and Cereus pedunculatus, from reduced major axis regression equations, computed using data from Stephenson (1929)

 
We also fit lines to the log-log plots of mean capsule dimension versus polyp diameter cubed. RMA slopes, intercepts, and R2 values (Table 4) are very close to those reported here and by Francis (2004). Polyp diameters were cubed to make these plots dimensionally compatible with our data, and with most of the scaling literature, where body size typically is represented by a weight (Wt {propto} Vol. {propto} L3).

Natural selection can affect both nematocyst size and nematocyst scaling
Nematocyst size appears to vary in an adaptive manner among species and as a function of body size. This conclusion is based on differences in the sizes and scaling exponents for tentacle and acontial nematocysts of the same types from the two Metridium species (Figs. 2, 4; Table 2). These differences are linked to function-related differences in selection pressures. While feeding structures typically are subject to stabilizing selection, favoring optimal cost-effectiveness, structures used in antipredator defense are subject to directional selection, favoring maximum affordable effect (cf. energetic analysis of jumping vs. hovering; Alexander, 2000).

Metridium species are primarily filter feeders; and the size of captured prey is similar for anemones of different sizes, both in subtidal and in intertidal habitats (Purcell, 1977; Sebens, 1981; Sebens and Koehl, 1984). Hence there is little or no advantage to increased size in the tentacle nematocysts with increasing body size.

Actual increases in the mean size of tentacle nematocysts are relatively small. For M. farcimen, mean capsule lengths increase 0%–8% for a 750-fold increase in body weight; and for M. senile, capsule lengths increase 4%–6% for a 30- to 70-fold increase in body weight. Nonetheless, correlations with body size are significant in 3 cases out of the 4. There are at least three plausible explanations for this correlation, and they could act individually or in combination. (1) Food size, food type, or both may actually change somewhat with body size, favoring this slight increase in the size of some tentacle nematocyst types with increasing body size. (2) Scaling of the tentacle nematocysts may be advantageous in some context other than feeding. (3) Minimal scaling of these tentacle cnidae could also occur incidentally if the size of collagen-secreting cells typically does increase with body size (discussed by Francis, 2004).

For the acontial nematocysts, predation pressure favoring maximum affordable size is reflected in the larger size of the acontial nematocysts (Fig. 4) and the significantly larger RMA scaling exponents for acontial capsule lengths (0.035–0.051), as compared with the smaller scaling exponents (0.008–0.018) for the same nematocyst types in the tentacles (Fig. 2 and Table 2). There is one exception: for M. senile, the scaling exponents for capsule lengths of the acontial amastigophores (0.047) and the tentacle amastigophores (0.031) are not distinguishable at these sample sizes (Table 2).

Energy scaling analysis (Sebens, 1981) and mechanical analysis (Francis, 2004) both predict that larger anemones will be able to support larger defensive nematocysts: that is, the size of the maximum affordable and supportable defense structure should increase with body size. Sebens (1981) has shown that in some cases, larger anemone body size reflects higher net energy intake, suggesting that larger anemones may be able to afford relatively larger acontia and larger acontial nematocysts. Larger anemones also have thicker mesoglea (Shick, 1991; Francis, 2004), which can support a thicker attached layer of tissue and larger nematocysts (i.e., larger acontia and acontial nematocysts, Figs. 1 and 2; Tables 1 and 2).

Significant differences in nematocyst scaling exponents have never before been reported. Both the larger size (Fig. 4) and larger scaling exponents of the acontial nematocysts, as compared with their tentacle homologs (Fig. 2), reflect the difference in selective regimes. This suggests both that nematocyst scaling is responsive to selection and that the size of acontial nematocysts plays an important role in antipredator defense.


   Summary
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Summary
Literature Cited
 
The strong and consistent pattern of positive correlations between the size of defensive structures and body size for these two Metridium species supports the hypothesis that better acontial defenses provide a refuge from predation for larger acontiate anemones. These findings, combined with function-related differences between tissues and habitat-related differences between species, make a compelling argument for the value of larger acontial nematocysts in deterring potential predators. Differences in the scaling of tentacle and acontial nematocysts illustrate a novel pathway by which nematocysts may become specialized for particular functions.


   Acknowledgments
 
Thanks to Richard Palmer, Mike LaBarbera, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and suggestions. The work was supported in part by NSF 9731144, REU support through Western Washington University, Shannon Point Marine Center. For access to facilities and helpful discussion, we thank the directors, staff, and colleagues at SPMC (WWU); for the image analysis system at Shannon Point, we thank the NSF Instrumentation and Laboratory Improvement Program and Texaco Foundation. Without this support, the work would not have been possible.


   Footnotes
 
Received 31 July 2003; accepted 6 July 2004.


   Literature Cited
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Summary
 Literature Cited
 

    Alexander, R. McN. 2000. Hovering and jumping: contrasting problems in scaling. Pp. 37–50 in Scaling in Biology, J. H. Brown and G. B. West, eds. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
    Annett, C., and R. Pierotti. 1984. Foraging behavior and prey selection of the leather seastar Dermasterias imbricata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14:197–206.
    Arsenault, D. J., and J. H. Himmelman. 1996. Size-related changes in vulnerability to predators and spatial refuge use by juvenile Iceland scallops Chlamys islandica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 140:115–122.
    Bronmark, C., and J. G. Miner. 1992. Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science258:1348–1350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Bucklin, A. 1987a. Growth and asexual reproduction of the sea anemone Metridium: comparative laboratory studies of three species. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 110:41–52.
    Bucklin, A. 1987b. Adaptive advantages of patterns of growth and asexual reproduction of the sea anemone Metridium senile (L.) in intertidal and submerged populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.110:225–243.
    Bucklin, A., and D. Hedgecock. 1982. Biochemical genetic evidence for a third species of Metridium (Coelenterata, Actiniaria). Mar. Biol.66:1–7.
    Christensen, B. 1996. Predator foraging capabilities and prey antipredator behaviours: pre- versus postcapture constraints on size-dependent predator-prey interactions. Oikos76:368–380.
    Curio, E. 1976. The Ethology of Predation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
    Edmunds, M., G. W. Potts, R. C. Swinfen, and V. L. Waters. 1974. The feeding preferences of Aeolidia papillosa (L.) (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK54:939–947.
    Edmunds, M., G. W. Potts, R. C. Swinfen, and V. L. Waters. 1976. Defensive behaviour of sea anemones in response to predation by the opisthobranch mollusc Aeolidia papillosa (L.). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK56:65–83.
    Fautin, D. G., and C. Hand. 2000. Metridium farcimen, the valid name of a common North Pacific sea anemone (Cnidaria: Actiniaria: Acontiaria). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash.113:1151–1161.
    Fautin, D. G., A. Bucklin, and C. Hand. 1989. Systematics of sea anemones belonging to genus Metridium (Coelenterata: Actiniaria), with a description of M. giganteum new species. Wasmann J. Biol.47:77–85.
    Francis, L. 2004. Microscaling: why larger anemones have longer cnidae. Biol Bull.207:116–129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Hand, C. 1954. The sea anemones of central California part I. The corallimorpharian and athenarian anemones. Wasmann J. Biol.12:345–375.
    Hand, C. 1956. The sea anemones of central California part III. The acontiarian anemones. Wasmann J. Biol.13:189–251.
    Harris, L. G. 1973. Nudibranch associations. Pp. 213–315 in Current Topics in Comparative Pathobiology, Vol. 2, T.C. Cheng, ed. Academic Press, New York.
    Harris, L. G. 1976. Comparative ecological studies of the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa and its anemone prey Metridium senile along the Atlantic and the Pacific coasts of the United States. J. Molluscan Stud.42:301.
    Harris, L. G. 1986. Size-selective predation in a sea anemone, nudibranch, and fish food chain. Veliger29:38–47.
    Harris, L. G. 1991. Comparative ecology of subtidal actiniarians from the coasts of California and the Gulf of Maine, USA. Hydrobiologia 216/217:271–278.
    Harris, L. G., and S. J. Duffy. 1980. The influence of prey size on the preference hierarchy of the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa (L.). Am. Zool.20:1087 (abstract).
    Hess, H. C. 1993. The evolution of parental care in brooding spirorbid polychaetes: the effect of scaling constraints. Am. Nat.141:577–596.
    Hintze, J. 2001. NCSS and PASS (software). Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, Utah.
    Huxley, J. S. 1932. The Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.
    Hyman, L. H. 1940. The Invertebrates: Protozoa Through Ctenophora. McGraw-Hill, London.
    LaBarbera, M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.20:97–117.[Web of Science]
    Longley, R. D. 1984. Axon surface infolding and axon size can be quantitatively related in gastropod mollusks. J. Exp. Biol.108:163–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Lundvall, D., R. Svanback, L. Persson, and P. Bystrom. 1999. Size-dependent predation in piscivores: interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.56:1285–1292.
    McArdle, B. H. 1988. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can. J. Zool.66:2329–2339.
    Paine, R. T. 1976. Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Piaster interaction. Ecology57:858–873.[Web of Science]
    Purcell, J. E. 1977. The diet of large and small individuals of the sea anemone Metridium senile. Bull. S. C. Acad. Sci. 76:168–172.
    Rayner, J. M. V. 1985. Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. J. Zool. (Lond.) A.206:415–439.
    Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution43:223–225.[Web of Science]
    Sebens, K. P. 1981. The allometry of feeding, energetics, and body size in three sea anemone species. Biol. Bull.161:152–171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    Sebens, K. P., and M. A. R. Koehl. 1984. Predation on zooplankton by the benthic anthozoans Alcyonim siderium (Alcyonacea) and Metridium senile (Actiniaria) in the New England subtidal. Mar. Biol.81:255–271.
    Shick, J. M. 1991. A Functional Biology of Sea Anemones. Chapman and Hall, London. 395 pp.
    Sih, A. 1985. Evolution, predator avoidance, and unsuccessful predation. Am. Nat.125:153–157.
    Sih, A. 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary overview. Pp. 203–224 in Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, eds. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.
    Smith, R. J. 1984. Allometric scaling in comparative biology: problems of concept and method. Am. J. Physiol.246:R152–R160.
    Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
    Stephenson, T. A. 1928. The British Sea Anemones, Vol 1. The Ray Society, London.
    Stephenson, T. A. 1929. On the nematocysts of sea anemones. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK16:173–201.
    Tripet, F., and N. Perrin. 1994. Size-dependent predation by Dugesia lugubris (Turbellaria) on Physa acuta (Gastropoda): experiments and model. Funct. Ecol.8:458–463.
    Vermeij, G. A. 1982. Unsuccessful predation and evolution. Am. Nat.120:701–720.
    Williams, R. B. 1996. Measurements of cnidae from sea anemones (Cnidaria: Actiniaria): statistical parameters and taxonomic relevance. Sci. Mar. 60 (2–3):339–351.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Bull.Home page
L. Francis
Microscaling: Why Larger Anemones Have Longer Cnidae
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2004; 207(2): 116 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Development
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Evolution
Right arrow Behavior
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Cnidarians

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS